IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] Applicability Statements Documents

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Fri, 27 September 2013 12:00 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F53F21E808D for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 05:00:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.755
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.755 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.843, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7sSKNf-RnwQ4 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 05:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA4711E814D for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 05:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=12866; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1380283234; x=1381492834; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=HtFTuWhxEiScecn4zIUzqeOP1tj+EYlgLEOOX5zbXFE=; b=Pl0gRNqK5+KVJqCOHh/oEfBfhxfQWh1uJSy1idnUfMc6wJjaIje+s84a yxSfz140KxOQ0IMsQGGLgK01Jucf6OhQg12ZXzY/RMWpSLFetJklwUeEw qipKDQsuOCi6dp+xTD0JNAbfhG9r5BpU8QTiU8ZttkrmV8Wb2P5Hk7VhZ E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AloFAOdxRVKtJXHA/2dsb2JhbABZgkNEOFK4CIhCgR4WdIIlAQEBBC0+HgIBCBEEAQELHQcyFAkIAgQTCId+DLoRjhmBBzcBgx2BAQOFT5NdkEmDJIIq
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.90,992,1371081600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="265234908"
Received: from rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com ([173.37.113.192]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Sep 2013 12:00:32 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com [173.36.12.81]) by rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r8RC0Wkm029584 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 12:00:32 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([169.254.1.197]) by xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com ([173.36.12.81]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 07:00:32 -0500
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Applicability Statements Documents
Thread-Index: AQHOurIsuKnIt0Zdg0iHwspwmGFIqpnZefjg
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 12:00:31 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 12:00:00 +0000
Message-ID: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD8414A222E@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
References: <03B78081B371D44390ED6E7BADBB4A77238284EB@xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <03B78081B371D44390ED6E7BADBB4A77238284EB@xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.61.223.27]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD8414A222Exmbrcdx01ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Roll] Applicability Statements Documents
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 12:00:47 -0000

Dear all

We publish a refresher in August. Point is until we have more deployments, we can hardly do better than what we have.
In particular we cannot fill:


4.2<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-phinney-roll-rpl-industrial-applicability-02#section-4.2>.  Layer-two features . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-phinney-roll-rpl-industrial-applicability-02#page-28>

       4.2.1.  Need layer-2 expert here.  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-phinney-roll-rpl-industrial-applicability-02#page-28>

       4.2.2.  Security functions provided by layer-2.  . . . . . . . 28<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-phinney-roll-rpl-industrial-applicability-02#page-28>

       4.2.3<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-phinney-roll-rpl-industrial-applicability-02#section-4.2.3>.  6LowPAN options assumed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-phinney-roll-rpl-industrial-applicability-02#page-28>

       4.2.4<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-phinney-roll-rpl-industrial-applicability-02#section-4.2.4>.  MLE and other things . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-phinney-roll-rpl-industrial-applicability-02#page-28>

My suggestion is to drop that section and publish what we have as an informational RFC.
If 6TiSCH is formed, then we will have better information there to make a refined applicability statement for RPL over that particular MAC, which is today the industrial LLN of choice.

Cheers,

Pascal

From: roll-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
Sent: jeudi 26 septembre 2013 14:16
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks
Subject: [Roll] Applicability Statements Documents

Dear all (especially to the authors),

As you know, we are dramatically lagging behind with regards to our applicability statements (AMI, home, industrial, ...). As a reminder:


Feb 2013

Submit first draft of RPL applicability statement for Home Automation applications to the IESG to be considered as an Informational RFC

Feb 2013

Submit first draft of RPL applicability statement for Building Automation applications to the IESG to be considered as an Informational RFC

Feb 2013

Submit first draft of RPL applicability statement for Industrial applications to the IESG to be considered as an Informational RFC


So we would really appreciate if the authors could give us an update on these WG documents, copying the list.

Many Thanks !

JP and Michael.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email