[Roll] AODV-RPL should be Standard or Experimental?
Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com> Wed, 14 August 2019 17:19 UTC
Return-Path: <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37E2120C1A for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 10:19:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.587
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.587 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=googlemail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GKbCbCbFjUEI for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 10:19:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x242.google.com (mail-oi1-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 172B912018B for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 10:19:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x242.google.com with SMTP id m206so73995659oib.12 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 10:19:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5nhvA9WUycg2HDacAJ1GqXpJSmxpCRPDFgqrRRE3iac=; b=kO/9rMhihsuuMSNot7g0ujIbex+ExRK7sS21NS3ZyQTHG+G8L4dy9iKbVpTVDUuCpn aoITuvvd+gh51z/97HIfmorx7e3J5G6jwtR5jme9KU6BuMGy6xsHt/6PQYJZew6680As w78E4ediirbOQfOl8idincZCzh2uizuE7f384TBQ0rD2OY//QcT//x24KwPmztDGozzs 3KyhsSLfl9LzykquKbXWxhaKyWSWRaZeB67UH3QKwhWUSNjaF+zSiUdDTBc9069OEPR+ o5cuW/TO7QsIM/zFvnlv2Ei8VyytPJ2Ry+cLyZSmxnSll2+VD8vf379xKzT2Z3zarNPG NQDg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5nhvA9WUycg2HDacAJ1GqXpJSmxpCRPDFgqrRRE3iac=; b=TihghvrHUC/0NSKwD9+zmgKARw/wYAAgFmhPJ79/zMz86ZLfTINg+dTOcMHGMRh5O3 kYGA+VLUuUylsup36v0csqIvhsuAI8YZxJaZO++GdcKOEkcquJxW7hARbUNYjoPHF5fw vDWRf8psKPkx0GwjPNAB3wxN2pDPqOyEOw8cSqvm3Y8MlUaDmgNylX7Y5xwutHUKhzj4 2rxNQWzCMX8jxkwJ5vikFngMmYMU2di6KCXE9LN899EPDo1/GEcyE0tqGyZ3cGBlRQ9Z +Dp8fhEPPZ+OuiQ/3HkvJyBT52InUMuXAkhvnVT8HTZvzYZv6yexUXdHRUKKUfb7r1Gu ic3A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX7K6ioQhkT8vwbMVL7s2LD+H+GU3/xTILkfh6H5kDpTawAGHi1 YYdaR4d+akdmKXSDY0hrTgUfJSTdv4jOMFV6rWavaOOCZI4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwNzFMPaMZWGYdA3SnXjCV7QKEHUdcKpJTR+8Z2N5EYm1TYTii7eOmVaRU3XXhHyn9+36xmMT/JhjVzbMLAHhA=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:708e:: with SMTP id f136mr389924jac.57.1565803166627; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 10:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 20:19:15 +0300
Message-ID: <CAP+sJUeQLRL=riFn3KJJ0iicbTf9D7u3z6JGnjR6C9cjabacDg@mail.gmail.com>
To: roll <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000088fa6e059016f5f7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/RbA7zgYItFCqq1vvHC2IGkK1wVc>
Subject: [Roll] AODV-RPL should be Standard or Experimental?
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 17:19:30 -0000
Dear all, We would like to know your opinion whether AODV-RPL should be Standard or Experimental Track. Source Ticket: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/roll/ticket/195 - Experimental draft description https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2026#section-4.2.1, Standard Track description https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2026#section-4.1 - The Experimental RFC 6997 describes an approach for Reactive Discovery of P2P Routes. AODV-RPL specifies an approach for reactive P2P route discovery mechanism for hop-by-hop and source routing. Should these two drafts be aligned as Experimental ones? RFC 6997 was made experimental because its deployment future was uncertain. The same may apply to AODV-RPL. When there are sure commitments for deployment of AODV-RPL, we should like to be informed. Thank you very much in advance, Ines and Peter.
- [Roll] AODV-RPL should be Standard or Experimenta… Ines Robles
- Re: [Roll] AODV-RPL should be Standard or Experim… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)