[Roll] WG call to adopt draft-phinney-roll-rpl-industrial-applicability-01

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 20 February 2013 19:04 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7005A21F88E3 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:04:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5MhVOQvN12Rz for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:04:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6B821F88C7 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:04:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9924A20168 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:11:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 608886376B; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:03:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50AC26376A for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:03:06 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.3; nmh 1.3-dev; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:03:06 -0500
Message-ID: <17078.1361386986@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Subject: [Roll] WG call to adopt draft-phinney-roll-rpl-industrial-applicability-01
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:04:15 -0000

This is to start a 1 week WG call on adopting

 RPL applicability in industrial networks
 draft-phinney-roll-rpl-industrial-applicability-01

Abstract

   The wide deployment of wireless devices, with their low installed
   cost (compared to wired devices), will significantly improve the
   productivity and safety of industrial plants.  It will simultaneously
   increase the efficiency and safety of the plant's workers, by
   extending and making more timely the information set available about
   plant operations.  The new Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy
   Networks (RPL) defines a Distance Vector protocol that is designed
   for such networks.  The aim of this document is to analyze the
   applicability of that routing protocol in industrial LLNs formed of

as a WG document.

This is part of satisfying the ROLL Charter.

Please, if you have objection to this document as a starting document
towards use of RPL in Industrial Control networks please speak by
2013-02-28.


-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works 
IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/