[Roll] FW: RFC 6687 on Performance Evaluation of the Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPL)

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 05 October 2012 10:31 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA9F21F861E for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 03:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qdCo1EWkFq7p for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 03:31:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (asmtp4.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658A521F8618 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 03:31:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q95AVK9v010922 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 11:31:20 +0100
Received: from 950129200 ([31.100.97.218]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q95AVHJE010899 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 11:31:19 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: roll@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 11:31:15 +0100
Message-ID: <10a501cda2e4$8eb25ef0$ac171cd0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac2i4s0QlKi8vKo2TbKvDZWWBGajZg==
Content-Language: en-gb
Subject: [Roll] FW: RFC 6687 on Performance Evaluation of the Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPL)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 10:31:26 -0000

The ROLL WG will want to be aware of this new RFC.

Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-announce-
> bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> Sent: 04 October 2012 22:55
> To: ietf-announce@ietf.org; rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
> Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> Subject: RFC 6687 on Performance Evaluation of the Routing Protocol for Low-
> Power and Lossy Networks (RPL)
> 
> 
> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
> 
> 
>         RFC 6687
> 
>         Title:      Performance Evaluation of the Routing
>                     Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks
>                     (RPL)
>         Author:     J. Tripathi, Ed.,
>                     J. de Oliveira, Ed.,
>                     JP. Vasseur, Ed.
>         Status:     Informational
>         Stream:     Independent
>         Date:       October 2012
>         Mailbox:    jt369@drexel.edu,
>                     jau@coe.drexel.edu,
>                     jpv@cisco.com
>         Pages:      26,
>         Characters: 63624
>         Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None
> 
>         I-D Tag:    draft-tripathi-roll-rpl-simulation-08.txt
> 
>         URL:        http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6687.txt
> 
> This document presents a performance evaluation of the Routing
> Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPL) for a small outdoor
> deployment of sensor nodes and for a large-scale smart meter network.
> Detailed simulations are carried out to produce several routing
> performance metrics using these real-life deployment scenarios.
> Please refer to the PDF version of this document, which includes
> several plots for the performance metrics not shown in the plain-text
> version.  This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification;
> it is published for informational purposes.
> 
> 
> INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
> It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
> this memo is unlimited.
> 
> This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
> To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
>   http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>   http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
> 
> For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
> For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.
> 
> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
> author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
> specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
> unlimited distribution.
> 
> 
> The RFC Editor Team
> Association Management Solutions, LLC