[Roll] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-25: (with COMMENT)
Adam Roach via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 01 May 2019 04:27 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: roll@ietf.org
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 330AE1200B1; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 21:27:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adam Roach via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo@ietf.org, Peter Van der Stok <consultancy@vanderstok.org>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, roll-chairs@ietf.org, consultancy@vanderstok.org, roll@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.95.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <155668484520.29014.7741405460230963379.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 21:27:25 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/YO6sp1dJcnC4xlGqaZ6LK7Xk_sQ>
Subject: [Roll] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-25: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 May 2019 04:27:25 -0000
Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-25: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks to everyone who worked on this document. I have only one minor comment. I'm a bit perplexed by the interplay between sections 3.1 and 3.3. Section 3.1 says: > This change creates a flag day for existing networks which are > currently using 0x63 as the RPI value. And then section 3.3 says: > In order to avoid a Flag Day caused by lack of interoperation between > new RPI (0x23) and old RPI (0x63) nodes, this section defines a flag > in the DIO Configuration Option... Which leaves me wondering whether the net effect of this document does or does not create a flag day for networks. Please consider updating these sections to be consistent with each other.
- [Roll] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-ro… Adam Roach via Datatracker
- Re: [Roll] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-iet… Ines Robles
- Re: [Roll] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-iet… Adam Roach