[Roll] RPL (RFC 6550). DTSN
Alejandro Martin LAMPROPULOS <alejandro.lampropulos@telecom-bretagne.eu> Wed, 24 October 2012 16:27 UTC
Return-Path: <alejandro.lampropulos@telecom-bretagne.eu>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 763C121F8B7E for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:27:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.172
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.172 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=2.077]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5euLQRqma0iH for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:27:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zproxy220.enst-bretagne.fr (zproxy220.enst-bretagne.fr [192.108.117.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA6C21F85F3 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zproxy220.enst-bretagne.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF842342DA for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:27:23 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zproxy220.enst-bretagne.fr
Received: from zproxy220.enst-bretagne.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zproxy220.enst-bretagne.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mWWg4nGrzVjY for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:27:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from zmail210.enst-bretagne.fr (zmail210.enst-bretagne.fr [10.29.89.130]) by zproxy220.enst-bretagne.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DADF342C3 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:27:23 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:27:23 +0200
From: Alejandro Martin LAMPROPULOS <alejandro.lampropulos@telecom-bretagne.eu>
To: roll@ietf.org
Message-ID: <276d7202-9185-4e21-95dc-34723d8001d3@zmail210>
In-Reply-To: <f995e891-2d96-4a7d-ae30-0cdfd26154b7@zmail210>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.1.3_GA_3374 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Mac)/7.1.3_GA_3346)
Subject: [Roll] RPL (RFC 6550). DTSN
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 07:35:57 -0000
Hi, I saw that in the RFC 6550 the DTSN value is used to trigger DAO messages from sub-DODAG. My question is, when would it be useful to increment this value? In the RFC it says: 'A RPL implementation MAY allow for configuring a set of rules specifying the triggers for DTSN increment (manual or event-based).' Which events could be used to trigger the DTSN incrementation? Thank you very much. Regards, Alejandro
- [Roll] RPL (RFC 6550). DTSN Alejandro Martin LAMPROPULOS