Re: [Roll] Source Routing Header Format

Pascal, 

+1. It seems a good starting point. 

Daniel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: roll-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 8:36 AM
> To: JP Vasseur; JeongGil Ko (John)
> Cc: ROLL WG
> Subject: Re: [Roll] Source Routing Header Format
> 
> Hi JP:
> 
> For the P2P, it appears that we'll need the record route piece as well.
> But the record route does not preexist in IPv6 standards.
> 
> It is present in my early work on tree discovery, so in a somewhat
> similar context of mobile routers forming networks:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thubert-nemo-reverse-routing-header
> 
> One option to move forward could be to start from that draft and make
> it
> a separate spec.
> 
> We'd cleanup the mobility/tunnel pieces  and make it fully agnostic to
> routing protocols.
> 
> What does the group think?
> 
> Pascal
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: roll-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of JP
> > Vasseur
> > Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 2:44 PM
> > To: JeongGil Ko (John)
> > Cc: ROLL WG
> > Subject: Re: [Roll] Source Routing Header Format
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On May 7, 2010, at 8:24 AM, JeongGil Ko (John) wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Have we decided on what the routing header format will be for
> point-
> > > to-point routing?
> > > The last discussion that I remember concluded with "Let's do
> something
> > > like RH0 and do tag/labels for addressing".
> >
> > Right, Jonathan agreed to take the ownership of the ticket: indeed
> the
> > conclusion was RH0-like, staying within RPL domain to avoid security
> issues.
> > Labels may come next (separate ID).
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > JP.
> >
> > > Do we have anything else after that?
> > >
> > > -John
> > >
> > > ------
> > > JeongGil Ko (John)
> > > Ph.D. Student
> > > Department of Computer Science
> > > Johns Hopkins University
> > > http://www.cs.jhu.edu/~jgko
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Roll mailing list
> > > Roll@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Roll mailing list
> > Roll@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll