[Roll] Intention for draft-thubert-roll-forwarding-frags

Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com> Thu, 23 January 2014 22:44 UTC

Return-Path: <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 831211A0462 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:44:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.377
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.377 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WNLvF-feoURu for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:44:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vc0-x231.google.com (mail-vc0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C7C1A045A for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:43:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id if11so1437119vcb.22 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:43:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=hMs/dIXR7eOLH6Ls2U50+szQb0jotzqBKgqGbC0I3TA=; b=iirTIBCisRN6//BNjzOnpiEr8ylHdIw0bOxJ6VE2g6KHKZOXCZb6ImxC2HE9RJxUsw hLku0nFthOA+TXm+eWXKrFTnsmYMaiK4TlnDB0e/Ol5/2XnkcB9szD0SCLYR3DJ+0cp0 DABv2N6SEJGev7Iq3jEcQF2TAs3/vGc8dqZUZdwREGW7XZWxkD3HA/jf57+wFX2IlGw6 puPKejIWqEtkuaY4j0wgUCE0pvKZ08jKvx9YBKCPuudiu4EELMAY2WigE63j573BqoSs MF2yKCZczrypgTG4jIdiXwm7skHeVPpZ6+HseWwRPvkwLOTXHY/qiWCZpY67OG0jgoP0 gpQg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.58.123.70 with SMTP id ly6mr2595163veb.26.1390517038770; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:43:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.49.68 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:43:58 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:43:58 -0200
Message-ID: <CAP+sJUfF-hs5+C-2F98Gaa9Sv_1fZcioUxVCaR2EN-y=5vDLwA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>, "Jonathan Hui (johui)" <johui@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0118490e266e9404f0aafa75"
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, roll <roll@ietf.org>
Subject: [Roll] Intention for draft-thubert-roll-forwarding-frags
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 22:44:01 -0000

*Hi Pascal and Jonathan,Thank you very much for
draft-thubert-roll-forwarding-frags-02,Abstract:In order to be routed, a
fragmented packet must be reassembled at   every hop of a multihop link
where lower layer fragmentation occurs.   Considering that the IPv6 minimum
MTU is 1280 bytes and that an an   802.15.4 frame can have a payload
limited to 74 bytes in the worst   case, a packet might end up fragmented
into as many as 18 fragments   at the 6LoWPAN shim layer.  If a single one
of those fragments is   lost in transmission, all fragments must be resent,
further   contributing to the congestion that might have caused the initial
  packet loss.  This draft introduces a simple protocol to forward and
  recover individual fragments that might be lost over multiple hops
  between 6LoWPAN endpoints.We would like to know please how you see that
this draft is aligned with the roll charter, it seems that the intention is
in this thread:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/msg07784.html
<http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/msg07784.html>, is that
correct? do you have some additional information for intention? Thank you
in advance,Michael and Ines.*