Re: [Roll] "Charter inclusion: Work in RPL control messages: DIS - Roll Digest Vol 103, Issue 2

"William" <william.vicdev@gmail.com> Tue, 09 August 2016 10:08 UTC

Return-Path: <william.vicdev@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F169312D75B for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 03:08:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24=3.199, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_MIME_MALF=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cREPrmEJrGx7 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 03:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x233.google.com (mail-pf0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB02112D76B for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 03:08:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x233.google.com with SMTP id y134so3834142pfg.0 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 03:08:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:thread-index :content-language; bh=lsXCaA93qeCwOlXQjRoIA/y6VfD8j2Lhf2uLqRt6e1o=; b=YGhRPP92osTsaT/OX6PSRyaGDM6rnJNgWdcC8rtGIgz/sGMl6OZmviD4sV3Kux0vLe 9IpyoMa4X1If0tGaIDcfH+XfcyoNLoz9eizKORuADeF6pW2rr8xHfLwYxwzIS3gZfgjv fYKWjmpmD/q9zkwWuyKrUjIboewrK1i1AL2Vaa4Ie5Zk77X7jQ7XOi6SBvPSkSrbISyP lgK3ci3vL6sNrtcCd3gVzPZi7XK/FSOVN7tjraekZoKch4vVegfVesnjKSr7YgPDza8B sHdxecDdRg1wh9ZcK/TUmU05PBjw5DuM3Df6BveAyewaJmjwVTb1/fk8yC72+2fkW94l 0Vmw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :thread-index:content-language; bh=lsXCaA93qeCwOlXQjRoIA/y6VfD8j2Lhf2uLqRt6e1o=; b=RzNbng2rNfd9KaQfOZjS7ARUbTxCmXJG8txyeRZQeJ9eIHb+OETC2il4WK/fxAjf1R SphpRAdGZaB9+c9WNYIG5cbAz/TM5RILavXoSzsamnJBLPwBFC2yP9TB8Rnl092m2ab0 HvvMeJxJGdfcoYxRKWyLtwWSzlzUayvo4EGVS2pm2QlHAKak0v0OnMakVtB7iVN6OQlO LJb/CihXi35A2SDVF73PxX3qulboOsfb6qLhMh30d6bIhTpWmtzTQ+6FXrfknKd8W8gI mpTmP6uorz1zNPFaXw4W+fk2yHLo9B6mcfiE2gLfJC2iAVYnTVPS8VHCT4E+Rf6rTrAh 0dfw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvHLAU0mLK5Y4Lviimg2zFl6EZ6Bsnjxvx1tq+9qJe2Gr8h6LQRoS6mWFufrnuA9g==
X-Received: by 10.98.63.1 with SMTP id m1mr170648938pfa.14.1470737312994; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 03:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP2B5C9P6 ([220.70.2.112]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id yp10sm54764346pab.25.2016.08.09.03.08.30 for <roll@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Aug 2016 03:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: William <william.vicdev@gmail.com>
To: roll@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 19:08:28 -0700
Message-ID: <000f01d1f2ac$1772ef00$4658cd00$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0010_01D1F271.6B1B42F0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AdHyqmNEiBi4OvTbQkWdyWBHB1dveA==
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/_kfy1OBaB2nnhxboxTN60_0veWI>
Subject: Re: [Roll] "Charter inclusion: Work in RPL control messages: DIS - Roll Digest Vol 103, Issue 2
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 10:08:41 -0000

In my opinion, the draft draft-jadhav-roll-no-path-dao-ps-01 is quite
relevant.

I am just not confident about the second draft
draft-jadhav-roll-no-path-dao-ps-01. 

We have deployed a WSN for experiments, but have not paid attention to that
no-path DAO problem, so I still confuse about the importance of the draft. 

Jadhav and Cao, Have you implemented any testbeds for those cases written in
the draft? Or do you have any paper analyzed those cases in more detail?

If yes, I would like to do some real experiments to evaluate the importance
of the draft.

 

Kind regards,

William

PhD of Research

IoT based Smart Furniture for Smart Home <http://cuddlyhomeadvisors.com/>
Research Group

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Roll [mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of roll-request@ietf.org
Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 12:00 PM
To: roll@ietf.org
Subject: Roll Digest, Vol 103, Issue 2

 

Send Roll mailing list submissions to

                 <mailto:roll@ietf.org> roll@ietf.org

 

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

                 <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll

or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

                 <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org> roll-request@ietf.org

 

You can reach the person managing the list at

                 <mailto:roll-owner@ietf.org> roll-owner@ietf.org

 

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of Roll digest..."

 

 

Today's Topics:

 

   1. Re: "Charter inclusion: Work in RPL control messages: DIS

      Mod. - No-Path DAO" (Caozhen (zcao))

   2. Roll ietf96 minutes (peter van der Stok)

   3. Re: Roll ietf96 minutes (Ines Robles)

 

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Message: 1

Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 09:03:42 +0000

From: "Caozhen (zcao)" < <mailto:zhen.cao@huawei.com> zhen.cao@huawei.com>

To: " <mailto:consultancy@vanderstok.org> consultancy@vanderstok.org" <
<mailto:consultancy@vanderstok.org> consultancy@vanderstok.org>,

                "Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks" <
<mailto:roll@ietf.org> roll@ietf.org>

Subject: Re: [Roll] "Charter inclusion: Work in RPL control messages:

                DIS Mod. - No-Path DAO"

Message-ID:

                <
<mailto:0ADB5996A09C254EB300AB612DA81508215887F1@SZXEMI506-MBX.china.huawei.
com>
0ADB5996A09C254EB300AB612DA81508215887F1@SZXEMI506-MBX.china.huawei.com>

                

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

 

I would like to support both drafts (I am co-author of the second draft),
they are certainly relevant to the wg. 

 

I can contribute the review of the draft-gundogan-roll-dis-modifications. 

 

-Zhen

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Roll [ <mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org> mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org]
On Behalf Of peter van der 

> Stok

> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 7:44 PM

> To: Roll < <mailto:roll@ietf.org> roll@ietf.org>

> Subject: [Roll] "Charter inclusion: Work in RPL control messages: DIS 

> Mod. - No-Path DAO"

> 

> Dear all,

> 

> Following the ROLL Meeting at IETF 96, we would like to know your 

> opinion about the drafts, presented during IETF95 and IETF96. This is 

> the first set of three emails. The adoption of drafts as WG drafts 

> will be asked independently dependent on the status of the draft.

> 

> A: draft-gundogan-roll-dis-modifications-00

>        DIS Modifications

> 

> ?    Is the draft relevant to the working group.?

> ?    Do you foresee to contribute to the work described in the draft ?

> ?    Are you willing to review the draft ?

> ?    Should the draft be rejected by the WG ?

> 

> B: draft-jadhav-roll-no-path-dao-ps-01

>        No-Path DAO Problem Statement

> 

> ?    Is the draft relevant to the working group.?

> ?    Do you foresee to contribute to the work described in the draft ?

> ?    Are you willing to review the draft ?

> ?    Should the draft be rejected by the WG ?

> 

> 

> It would be nice to know the reasons why you agree or disagree with 

> the drafts

> 

> 

> Thank you very much,

> 

> Peter and Ines

> 

> _______________________________________________

> Roll mailing list

>  <mailto:Roll@ietf.org> Roll@ietf.org

>  <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll

 

------------------------------

 

Message: 2

Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 13:56:15 +0200

From: peter van der Stok < <mailto:stokcons@xs4all.nl> stokcons@xs4all.nl>

To: Roll < <mailto:roll@ietf.org> roll@ietf.org>

Subject: [Roll] Roll ietf96 minutes

Message-ID: < <mailto:e73b847138c32a0e5e9c6a59cc3774e5@xs4all.nl>
e73b847138c32a0e5e9c6a59cc3774e5@xs4all.nl>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

 

Dear all,

 

Many thanks to Dominique for the minutes.

They have been uploaded.

 

There are a few speakers denoted with xxx, whose identity could not be
determined.

Also there is some text by Don and Pascal that has got lost.

 

Could these persons complement the information?

 

many thanks,

 

Peter, Ines.

 

--

Peter van der Stok

vanderstok consultancy

mailto:  <mailto:consultancy@vanderstok.org> consultancy@vanderstok.org

www:  <http://www.vanderstok.org> www.vanderstok.org

tel NL: +31(0)492474673     F: +33(0)966015248

 

 

 

------------------------------

 

Message: 3

Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 16:22:23 +0300

From: Ines  Robles < <mailto:mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>

To: " <mailto:consultancy@vanderstok.org> consultancy@vanderstok.org" <
<mailto:consultancy@vanderstok.org> consultancy@vanderstok.org>,

                Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <
<mailto:roll@ietf.org> roll@ietf.org>

Subject: Re: [Roll] Roll ietf96 minutes

Message-ID:

                <
<mailto:CAP+sJUd7ntWSjr4mTntAW=bX5XyqCfmjdPX=ScSD0PHozyX5jw@mail.gmail.com>
CAP+sJUd7ntWSjr4mTntAW=bX5XyqCfmjdPX=ScSD0PHozyX5jw@mail.gmail.com>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

 

The minute can be found here

 

 <https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/minutes/minutes-96-roll>
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/minutes/minutes-96-roll

 

Many thanks to Dominique again :-)

 

Peter, Ines.

 

2016-08-04 14:56 GMT+03:00 peter van der Stok < <mailto:stokcons@xs4all.nl>
stokcons@xs4all.nl>:

 

> Dear all,

> 

> Many thanks to Dominique for the minutes.

> They have been uploaded.

> 

> There are a few speakers denoted with xxx, whose identity could not be

> determined.

> Also there is some text by Don and Pascal that has got lost.

> 

> Could these persons complement the information?

> 

> many thanks,

> 

> Peter, Ines.

> 

> --

> Peter van der Stok

> vanderstok consultancy

> mailto:  <mailto:consultancy@vanderstok.org> consultancy@vanderstok.org

> www:  <http://www.vanderstok.org> www.vanderstok.org

> tel NL: +31(0)492474673     F: +33(0)966015248

> 

> _______________________________________________

> Roll mailing list

>  <mailto:Roll@ietf.org> Roll@ietf.org

>  <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll

> 

-------------- next part --------------

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

URL: <
<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/attachments/20160804/a0898b03
/attachment.html>
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/attachments/20160804/a0898b03/
attachment.html>

 

------------------------------

 

Subject: Digest Footer

 

_______________________________________________

Roll mailing list

 <mailto:Roll@ietf.org> Roll@ietf.org

 <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll

 

 

------------------------------

 

End of Roll Digest, Vol 103, Issue 2

************************************