[Roll] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 02 September 2020 17:27 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: roll@ietf.org
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2AAC3A0C0B; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 10:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138@ietf.org, roll-chairs@ietf.org, roll@ietf.org, Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, mariainesrobles@googlemail.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.15.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <159906767077.10518.17525113825721227844@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 10:27:50 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/_obCBz248BvBDqD6wSwZMt6aBlM>
Subject: [Roll] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 17:27:51 -0000
Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-12: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Now that I know that an IANA registry exists for MOP, codepoint 7 should be included in the IANA considerations for the "Mode of Operation" Registry. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I found last paragraph of Section 3 confusing. I suggest the following change: OLD: Section 6.3.1 of [RFC6550] defines a 3-bit Mode of Operation (MOP) in the DIO Base Object. This specification applies to MOP values 0 to 6. For a MOP value of 7, the compression MUST be used by default regardless of the setting of the "T" flag. NEW: "Section 6.3.1 of [RFC6550] defines a 3-bit Mode of Operation (MOP) in the DIO Base Object. This specification adds codepoint 7 to the registry for this field. For a MOP value of 7, the compression MUST be used by default regardless of the setting of the "T" flag.“
- [Roll] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-roll-t… Martin Duke via Datatracker
- Re: [Roll] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-ro… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-ro… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-ro… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [Roll] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-ro… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-ro… Martin Duke
- Re: [Roll] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-ro… Michael Richardson