Re: [Roll] Last Call: <draft-ietf-roll-terminology-13.txt> (Terms used in Ruting for Low power And Lossy Networks) to Informational RFC
Scott O Bradner <sob@sobco.com> Thu, 03 October 2013 12:15 UTC
Return-Path: <sob@sobco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A29821F9B86; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 05:15:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.495
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ez8pOd6T366D; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 05:15:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sobco.sobco.com (unknown [136.248.127.164]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B205811E80EA; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 05:10:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1344830A0BC; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 08:10:10 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sobco.com
Received: from sobco.sobco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sobco.sobco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03qMdpeTsacR; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 08:10:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from dhcp3.sobco.com (unknown [136.248.127.173]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D46C30A0AE; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 08:10:08 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Scott O Bradner <sob@sobco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKHUCzyZJa=1bptBkxmY5673YwAje=iOoar++Szrk8F91nrU_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <033EBCD9-8D72-4264-B260-22F4207C9F0D@sobco.com>
References: <20131003103439.13078.31787.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <C2814ADA-6A29-4419-9D5F-97310A520A45@sobco.com> <CAKHUCzyZJa=1bptBkxmY5673YwAje=iOoar++Szrk8F91nrU_Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 06:19:38 -0800
Cc: roll@ietf.org, "ietf@ietf.org Discussion" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Last Call: <draft-ietf-roll-terminology-13.txt> (Terms used in Ruting for Low power And Lossy Networks) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 12:15:20 -0000
X-Original-Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 08:10:07 -0400
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 12:15:20 -0000
that is what I thought at first which caused me to quickly take a look since the topic seemed to be a bit out of scope, even for the quite broad IETF official scope (though I'm not sure what SDO would be a an appropriate venue for standardization in this field) Scott On Oct 3, 2013, at 8:00 AM, Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Scott O Bradner <sob@sobco.com> wrote: > > On Oct 3, 2013, at 6:34 AM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote: > > > > > The IESG has received a request from the Routing Over Low power and Lossy > > networks WG (roll) to consider the following document: > > - 'Terms used in Ruting for Low power And Lossy Networks' > > <draft-ietf-roll-terminology-13.txt> as Informational RFC > > "Ruting" - "Rüting is a municipality in the Nordwestmecklenburg district, in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany" > > the first sentence in the abstract says "routing" - maybe the title is in need of Vana White? > > > I'd assumed that they'd misspelt "rutting", and was quite disappointed in the document as a result. > > Dave.
- [Roll] Last Call: <draft-ietf-roll-terminology-13… The IESG
- Re: [Roll] Last Call: <draft-ietf-roll-terminolog… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] Last Call: <draft-ietf-roll-terminolog… Scott O Bradner
- Re: [Roll] Last Call: <draft-ietf-roll-terminolog… Dave Cridland
- Re: [Roll] Last Call: <draft-ietf-roll-terminolog… Scott O Bradner