IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] RPL-MIB

Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 09 February 2014 13:33 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCD7A1A06D6 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 05:33:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eijUyeXvdVsN for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 05:33:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qa0-x233.google.com (mail-qa0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF661A02E1 for <roll@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 05:33:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id f11so8165434qae.10 for <roll@ietf.org>; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 05:33:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=NMlN8vzhjotc0Sq+WhQoUfoAX8mbHhCcdEUt59If0xw=; b=mMX3IwuEg1wkKCcQUxz04OJu0OZlAp2E1gMSNGDKO4OKrEEbWoae46uWdUpQTgFsXm pkmlUscdpGfMbVeSkVIQLNO2gUrV9sxVUx2vRZviX7EaPmIbBkeVqp2PUTRhUy93mxCM +TfEQfKNF8pepcBdGccYVN0gDMJjDbeUVELsvl678mUGcdeIMC0DPTfYZIUgSmq1xEa7 QvMDNjwRJucQHqo0X07wReiS+i2PexmIzzgCyRo1xrp18xfINShlIFTzDWIkmpAgW8h8 lCsErAx8zr9+XxCt39yFIFvF9MlLlEXPzbkeUVRz/AgN3ANtJSvKfT679hqXSUm3osol CRmQ==
X-Received: by 10.224.43.144 with SMTP id w16mr39255337qae.93.1391952802967; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 05:33:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:4830:16b1:1:2d0d:eb20:392f:b374? ([2001:4830:16b1:1:2d0d:eb20:392f:b374]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h12sm19075228qge.0.2014.02.09.05.33.20 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 09 Feb 2014 05:33:21 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <bcd61e99e8abd20457439d149a3fb75d@xs4all.nl>
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 08:33:19 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DF1C20CD-4596-4AB7-BFA9-F52AA7C28875@gmail.com>
References: <bcd61e99e8abd20457439d149a3fb75d@xs4all.nl>
To: consultancy@vanderstok.org, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Subject: Re: [Roll] RPL-MIB
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 13:33:25 -0000

On Feb 7, 2014, at 5:31 AM 2/7/14, peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> wrote:

> Dear authors,
> 
> Is it possible to extend the RPL MIB with MPL parameters?

Why would MPL parameters be added to the RPL MIB?  MPL and RPL share very little, if any, protocol or operational considerations.

- Ralph

> 
> Easy suggestions are per interface the parameters:
> DATA_MESSAGE_IMIN, DATA_MESSAGE_IMAX, DATA_MESSAGE_K,DATA_MESSAGE_TIMER_EXPIRATIONS
> CONTROL_MESSAGE_IMIN, CONTROL_MESSAGE_IMAX, CONTROL_MESSAGE_K,CONTROL_MESSAGE_TIMER_EXPIRATIONS
> 
> per interface: the enabled MC addresses.
> 
> Measured values per seed and MC address: low seq nr, high seq nr
> the number of messages received, number of messages repeated, number of messages rejected because c>k.
> 
> Looking forward to your reply,
> 
> Peter
> 
> -- 
> Peter van der Stok
> mailto: consultancy@vanderstok.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email