IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] Call for Adoption for draft-thubert-6lo-routing-dispatch

Robert Cragie <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com> Wed, 02 December 2015 12:00 UTC

Return-Path: <robert.cragie@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D91B1A88AD; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 04:00:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WnfvLP1pmZwz; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 04:00:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22b.google.com (mail-lf0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D6641A88AC; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 04:00:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by lfdl133 with SMTP id l133so46996829lfd.2; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 04:00:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=i1IlDK1WwIu3G3vsRRIa99a7bRX6+jvghTmqsdit6SQ=; b=0IiHEHGksaCi/TSBoh5VfTpyF7GvI1cFUf1P1IfFeABzlHVYl0RdDSbzId6/nLiZUx gx+cMM9MaovrPc9jIC2WwaVVd5Z+XXGbUGcUyZaiHJXNuKmUnVRRWWPdh+hYqR9rrH+P NTJpFWjfJoy1cuRJad5HISGwspYYAuApaFnioCHmSzPv9Djy5saSUtWcYrzzygg8AbBg mniV0+5R5PcKjdTViZo/tpxHAelD5fH799hSTICaTg/uLz5iRXeCn7jXjQA2ARL7abg3 t6EBWGSinxoOqov7TOJ54l6J1PHIyUmCVQcTmq22JsOQA3lN7RRUiS9vjxhMQzNF5qo8 2lrQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.99.4 with SMTP id em4mr2156702lbb.87.1449057625529; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 04:00:25 -0800 (PST)
Sender: robert.cragie@gmail.com
Received: by 10.25.156.75 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 04:00:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <339867217aca4830a2f7b2611ce5652a@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <BN1PR03MB0729A4968279D249AD4BBF2951D0@BN1PR03MB072.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <ECA43DA70480A3498E43C3471FB2E1F0222B5CB3@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <339867217aca4830a2f7b2611ce5652a@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 12:00:25 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: qZhzqI3oYPKTUy0CAQYUj-mzCyY
Message-ID: <CADrU+d+hakdv3eF-AQYocMX3akMNs7Qbpat4UE5BQo9upBGoSw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Cragie <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11340c9a0767bd0525e90533"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/f9BNaUSrOFd0cop28Whh2U5uvxA>
Cc: Samita Chakrabarti <samita.chakrabarti@ericsson.com>, Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Call for Adoption for draft-thubert-6lo-routing-dispatch
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: robert.cragie@gridmerge.com, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 12:00:29 -0000

Sorry for the late response - I also agree that a split would be a good
idea.

Robert

On 19 November 2015 at 17:02, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com>
wrote:

> Dear Samita:
>
>
>
> I agree that the split is a good idea. That way, ROLL can concentrate on
> the compression of the RPL artifacts themselves while 6lo has more focus on
> the paging mechanism.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Pascal
>
>
>
> *From:* 6lo [mailto:6lo-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Samita
> Chakrabarti
> *Sent:* mercredi 18 novembre 2015 08:06
> *To:* Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>; 6lo@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [6lo] Call for Adoption for
> draft-thubert-6lo-routing-dispatch
>
>
>
> As a WG member, I support the adoption of this document.
>
>
>
> With chair hat on – after adoption it would be good to make a decision
> whether we should split the document into two. One for generic non-ESC
> dispatch specification and the 2nd one is for RPL specific definition of
> the non-ESC dispatch. That way, in future any 6lo usecase that wants to use
> the non-ESC dispatch specification can follow the generic document.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> -Samita
>
>
>
> *From:* Gabriel Montenegro [mailto:Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 17, 2015 12:07 PM
> *To:* 6lo@ietf.org
> *Cc:* Samita Chakrabarti
> *Subject:* Call for Adoption for draft-thubert-6lo-routing-dispatch
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> This starts a 6lo Working Group adoption call for the following draft:
>
>
>
> A Routing Header Dispatch for 6LoWPAN
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thubert-6lo-routing-dispatch/
>
>
>
> This draft solves a problem for ROLL, namely that of compression of RPL
> artifacts. It also appears to be extensible enough that it could be useful
> for other scenarios, especially after discussions at IETF 93 in Prague
> (context switch approach) and confirmation at IETF 94 in Yokohama.
>
>
>
>
> This document is intended as standards-track.
>
>
>
> Please send your opinion (“Yes” or “No”) to the mailing list on adopting
> this document as a 6lo WG document.
>
>
>
> This call will end at 00:00 UTC on December 1, 2015.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Chairs
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email