[Roll] draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-priority (was Re: IETF 113 - Call for Presentations)

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 28 February 2022 15:23 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1BA3A12B9 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 07:23:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qoDgRPVi0maX for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 07:23:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B4433A12B3 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 07:23:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB283899C for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 10:32:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id MvO7JZ_y6YiV for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 10:32:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F02938997 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 10:32:34 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1646062354; bh=T9Wji0giGGkpkfc92NvBDYCTBkGmbGlFJrUKLY/3Z2U=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=ake494Q5TYc+gQIByUi7r8jBMRwJ2y1YHqEMiixMwHvI6sF45ZWLgKdmsEHrDOEnf dKw5FBJrw1q2DQwyVgP5ia+WMwVR8nX2/kgwz+ffFqIaBTGUSFKupMTtJMqpMe9Uxm 4p0UogP/ZKWz0A2MblH5UD+N9/E/MzkW8n21rcFIoKNW5Z9rPM67TwH1O4cSs0UOQf v9ghQ+hXYoHR5KL9gw8aXoZLXkWzWstKGt4GyYknrcxjRkpCFJ8V/30E09Oq69/awN 6BEcBFPWi/FReveoXIIn3V3lWtYivf04+OMaEH8HAN9saRwAVYFiZMYLhlPnDZ7DPE v0jPAKd4fNsDQ==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F34CA for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 10:23:41 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAP+sJUcij+WCtC4HCja009_MazXhiSy9tDwUQmVzNOt7awHPBQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP+sJUcij+WCtC4HCja009_MazXhiSy9tDwUQmVzNOt7awHPBQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 10:23:41 -0500
Message-ID: <21196.1646061821@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/hTxVmxujqdfKRctz-8HLrHgAf84>
Subject: [Roll] draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-priority (was Re: IETF 113 - Call for Presentations)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 15:23:50 -0000

Ines Robles <mariainesrobles=40googlemail.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
    > Please let us know by 4th March if you desire to present a topic at the
    > IETF 113. We will have a one hour time-slot. Please indicate in your

draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-priority

It seems that we should revisit (again) the question about whether we want a
rank-by-rank mutable congestion metric that can communicated to pledges and
long-sleepy nodes that need to rejoin.

I have posted -06, since it expired while we were discussing/arguing :-)
This is just a snapshot of the state of editing, and does not represent a
specific proposal about how we will deal with the question.
That is:
  https://github.com/roll-wg/draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-priority/pull/14

is still open.  I think we we still need a lollipop counter to be merged.
I will work on things this week, as the draft cutoff is in one week.

Perhaps Rahul advance the case for a mutable metric.
I'm in favour of that, but I'm also a bit lost as to what is possible/efficient.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide