Re: [Roll] [roll] #114: mcast option number changed

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 11 April 2013 22:49 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FC1021F8842 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:49:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.216
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.216 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.383, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JwFqqfp0DvwS for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:49:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC6821F87E9 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:49:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (desk.marajade.sandelman.ca [209.87.252.247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4696720170 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 18:59:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id B29DBA9946; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 18:49:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2BEB9396 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 18:49:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <B50D0F163D52B74DA572DD345D5044AF188477D9@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
References: <058.01a618d1a7b5cd8b99d1962f7773d556@trac.tools.ietf.org> <12776.1365693408@sandelman.ca> <B50D0F163D52B74DA572DD345D5044AF18846B4C@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <31854.1365710815@sandelman.ca> <B50D0F163D52B74DA572DD345D5044AF188477D9@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.3; nmh 1.3-dev; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22)
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 18:49:14 -0400
Message-ID: <28247.1365720554@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Subject: Re: [Roll] [roll] #114: mcast option number changed
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 22:49:36 -0000

>>>>> "johui" == johui  <Jonathan> writes:
    >> okay.
    >> 
    >> This seems at odds with the slides that were produced last November.
    >> 
    >> http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/85/slides/slides-85-roll-5.pdf
    >> 
    >> Slide 3.  Did I misunderstand our conclusion as to how things work?
    >> Two mechanisms are describe in slide 3: MPL domain multicast,
    >> and Link Local Multicast.  Do we still have two mechanisms, or one?

    johui> We only have the MPL Domain mechanism (termed subnet-local in
    johui> a prior mail). 

    johui> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/msg07624.html

okay, this explains things: we decided in January that this was the
case.  I don't think that the ticket got closed properly with that
conclusion.  January was after we asked for the early adoption.

-- 
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [ 
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [ 
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [