Re: [Roll] mixture of storing and non-storing nodes

정종수 <jsjeong@etri.re.kr> Wed, 22 August 2012 00:39 UTC

Return-Path: <jsjeong@etri.re.kr>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 266D021F8559 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:39:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -94.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-94.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Przr5G7FCNBp for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:39:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailx.etri.re.kr (mailx.etri.re.kr [129.254.38.251]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D9A21F8555 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:39:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SMTPEG2.etri.info (ssbmailx [127.0.0.1]) by mailx.etri.re.kr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q7M0dhwF021664; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:39:44 +0900
Received: from SMTP3.etri.info (129.254.28.73) by SMTPEG2.etri.info (129.254.27.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:39:46 +0900
Received: from SMTP4.etri.info ([169.254.3.84]) by SMTP3.etri.info ([169.254.4.38]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:39:40 +0900
From: 정종수 <jsjeong@etri.re.kr>
To: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Roll] mixture of storing and non-storing nodes
Thread-Index: AQHNf8kla3ul5GjnHEWCevy5tyL565dkAG+AgAAHFwCAAF9BgA==
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:39:40 +0000
Message-ID: <8033D2D3-CCC0-4F1E-B1D1-A9510DA75BAF@etri.re.kr>
References: <CADnDZ88Z5HxERPU_4a4KrbmPLa-parwPq=ndooE1OL9NTtPEWA@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ8_xy0r6hOjiX86=yb=zqWdQux0qHLtKtiZYze=hUT3ZXg@mail.gmail.com> <CAErDfUT52Mj0=wjyTK-8XdN-yYi5+KmZkZONOqFE3uC+LkTARQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAErDfUT52Mj0=wjyTK-8XdN-yYi5+KmZkZONOqFE3uC+LkTARQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: ko-KR, en-US
Content-Language: ko-KR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [129.254.192.201]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="euc-kr"
Content-ID: <4463FE6FAA42D8438F3576DAE47C3604@etri.re.kr>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: roll <roll@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] mixture of storing and non-storing nodes
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:39:51 -0000

Hi AB,

I also agree with Omprakash. Ko's draft describes a new RPL operation mode while your draft describes nodes' ability (functions and resources) advertisement/discovery in a given operation mode.

-Jongsoo

2012. 8. 22., 오전 3:58, Omprakash Gnawali <gnawali@cs.uh.edu>
 작성:

> 
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Abdussalam Baryun
> <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Omprakash
>> 
>>> The draft describes one of the problems that could
>> occur if we try to form a multi-hop network with storing and
>> non-storing nodes. That is a concrete first step towards getting a
>> handle on the challenge of having nodes with different capabilities in
>> a network.
>> Please not that NAP draft is a first step to handle different capabilities,
>> you may missed it when I described the problem in june and posted the draft
>> in first august. However, I like that we share the importance of the
>> *mixture abilities* idea now and that we can work together to solve the
>> problem.
> 
> Did you get a sense from the WG that this is an important problem? We
> can find many ways to extend and enhance every protocol but choose to
> work on a subset that is most relevant to those who are building
> devices and deploying networks.
> 
> Ko's draft talks about how to do multi-hop routing with storing and
> non-storing nodes. Your draft talks about discovering if nodes are
> able to participate due to various constraints. They seem different to
> me but are not mutually exclusive.
> 
> - om_p
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll