[Roll] New ROLL WG document: draft-ietf-roll-rpl-00.txt
JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com> Mon, 03 August 2009 07:23 UTC
Return-Path: <jvasseur@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F5763A6D6C for <roll@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 00:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.516
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.083, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NeO1Xyhv6qiZ for <roll@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 00:23:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C793A6999 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 00:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AoEAALosdkqQ/uCKe2dsb2JhbACaJAEBFiQGnjyIKY4RBYQY
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.43,312,1246838400"; d="scan'208";a="46308411"
Received: from ams-dkim-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.138]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Aug 2009 07:23:08 +0000
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (ams-core-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.150]) by ams-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n737N8Er008304 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 09:23:08 +0200
Received: from xbh-ams-102.cisco.com (xbh-ams-102.cisco.com [144.254.73.132]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n737N84p000066 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 07:23:08 GMT
Received: from xfe-ams-102.cisco.com ([144.254.231.94]) by xbh-ams-102.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 3 Aug 2009 09:23:08 +0200
Received: from ams-jvasseur-8712.cisco.com ([10.55.201.131]) by xfe-ams-102.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 3 Aug 2009 09:23:08 +0200
Message-Id: <06AC44C1-A238-4763-8782-BD8D25526A67@cisco.com>
From: JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>
To: ROLL WG <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 09:23:07 +0200
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Aug 2009 07:23:08.0375 (UTC) FILETIME=[3FF5CE70:01CA140B]
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-8.0.0.1181-5.600.1016-16802.005
X-TM-AS-Result: No--15.761700-8.000000-31
X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No
X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1337; t=1249284188; x=1250148188; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim1002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=jvasseur@cisco.com; z=From:=20JP=20Vasseur=20<jvasseur@cisco.com> |Subject:=20New=20ROLL=20WG=20document=3A=20draft-ietf-roll -rpl-00.txt |Sender:=20; bh=xnCi5pGVtCNBg3nCwAR+t/Ajxpdr2eqOdHn55RIiObY=; b=Kt/dmMhA22upEMKj8Tyg4GYd8KekFHJCg7JaRf57pA5w+V3pqz46WmAXiN bhcPe17vT50YnUr9SHPfniwIZ/DDZFBzeUu2UfYrjvCkychBUYvr+yWumLJ8 Le7g7GRmMc;
Authentication-Results: ams-dkim-1; header.From=jvasseur@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/amsdkim1002 verified; );
Subject: [Roll] New ROLL WG document: draft-ietf-roll-rpl-00.txt
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 07:23:09 -0000
Dear All, Many thanks for so much feed-back and fruitful discussions. We had a very good consensus during the WG meeting (very quickly) confirmed on the mailing list for adopting draft-dt-roll-rpl as a WG document. Authors, please resubmit draft-dt-roll-rpl-01.txt as draft-ietf-roll- rpl-00.txt with no other changes other than date and title. As expressed by several of you and acknowledged by the DT, there are still several open issues and items to discuss. As reminded on the mailing list and during the meeting, adopting an I-D as a WG document is by all means not an end (!!) and we still have substantial work ahead of us, but at least we have an excellent foundation and principles for which we have a very good consensus. In the list of items (with no particular order of importance): * Point to point routing, * Binding to ND, * Loss of RA-DIO, * Loop detection (to also be discussed in light of the solution proposed by DADR), * Source routing, * Address compression/label switching, * Security (let's just wait until we move on (soon) with the security framework document), * ... Very pleased to see that the WG is moving forward fast with excellent consensus and contributions. Stay tuned, I will propose a plan in term of next steps. Thanks. JP.