Re: [Roll] [roll] #96: Can the draft recommend how much to wait before a target selects routes to be sent back in DROs?

"roll issue tracker" <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org> Fri, 13 April 2012 09:06 UTC

Return-Path: <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC48A21F8596 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 02:06:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.451
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.451 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.148, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gvKE9Zk-Xk4S for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 02:06:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gamay.tools.ietf.org (gamay.tools.ietf.org [208.66.40.242]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB0F21F8587 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 02:06:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=gamay.tools.ietf.org) by gamay.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1SIcS8-0007pr-K7; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 05:06:00 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: roll issue tracker <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.2
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.2, by Edgewall Software
To: mukul@UWM.EDU, jpv@cisco.com
X-Trac-Project: roll
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:06:00 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/96#comment:1
Message-ID: <070.283717890fa20da1c2a5749443ec9016@trac.tools.ietf.org>
References: <055.f7a4657c0332f6393eb09f355b0158eb@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 96
In-Reply-To: <055.f7a4657c0332f6393eb09f355b0158eb@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: mukul@UWM.EDU, jpv@cisco.com, roll@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on gamay.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] [roll] #96: Can the draft recommend how much to wait before a target selects routes to be sent back in DROs?
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Reply-To: roll@ietf.org
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:06:02 -0000

#96: Can the draft recommend how much to wait before a target selects routes to
be sent back in DROs?

Changes (by jpv@…):

 * component:  applicability-ami => p2p-rpl


-- 
-----------------------------------+----------------------
 Reporter:  jpv@…                  |       Owner:  mukul@…
     Type:  defect                 |      Status:  new
 Priority:  major                  |   Milestone:
Component:  p2p-rpl                |     Version:
 Severity:  Submitted WG Document  |  Resolution:
 Keywords:                         |
-----------------------------------+----------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/96#comment:1>
roll <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/>