Re: [Roll] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-admin-local-policy-03: (with COMMENT)

peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> Thu, 19 February 2015 08:18 UTC

Return-Path: <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD45C1A88DB for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 00:18:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZuoJ9u5JtuOi for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 00:18:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lb1-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net (lb1-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net [194.109.24.24]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 723031A88BF for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 00:18:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from roundcube.xs4all.nl ([194.109.20.203]) by smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net with ESMTP id u8JN1p0084NtgTm018JNnr; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:18:22 +0100
Received: from AMontpellier-654-1-246-246.w92-133.abo.wanadoo.fr ([92.133.17.246]) by roundcube.xs4all.nl with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:18:22 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:18:22 +0100
From: peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
Mail-Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
In-Reply-To: <20150219045129.7667.64711.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20150219045129.7667.64711.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <41de52458882d6879002aec790ee20cc@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@xs4all.nl (lm03SPz63X97L6R2cnvzD/2VYmcVlRcW)
User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/r0ckYxWkTL3WET7DCk2d54kLCi4>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-admin-local-policy-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 08:18:27 -0000

Hi Spencer,

Actually I don't know whether it is the right terminology here.
It is used in algorithm proving texts, that I was used to.

The terms seem clear, and I will keep them for the moment,

thanks,

Peter

Spencer Dawkins schreef op 2015-02-19 05:51:
> Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-roll-admin-local-policy-03: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to 
> http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-admin-local-policy/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> One question: In this text:
> 
> 4.1.  Legal multicast messages
> 
>    Multicast messages can be created within the node by an application
>    or can arrive at an interface.
> 
>    A multicast message created at a source (MPL seed) is legal when it
>    conforms to the properties described in section 9.1 of
>    [I-D.ietf-roll-trickle-mcast].
> 
>    A multicast message received at a given interface is legal when:
> 
>    o  The message carries an MPL option (MPL message) and the incoming
>       MPL interface is subscribed to the destination multicast address.
> 
>    o  The message does not carry an MPL option, the multicast address 
> is
>       unequal to ALL_MPL_FORWARDERS scope 4 or scope 3, and the
>       interface has expressed interest to receive messages with the
>       specified multicast address via MLD [RFC3810] or via IGMP
>       [RFC3376].  The message was sent on according to PIM-DM [RFC3973]
>       or according to PIM-SM [RFC4601].
> 
>    Illegal multicast messages are discarded.
> 
> 4.2.  Forwarding legal packets
> 
>    A legal multicast message received at a given interface is assigned
>    the network identifier of the interface of the incoming link . A
>    message that is created within the node is assigned the network
>    identifier "any".
> 
>    Two types of legal multicast messages are considered: (1) MPL
>    messages, and (2) multicast messages which do not carry the MPL
>    option.
> 
> Is "legal/illegal" the right terminology for this?
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll