Re: [Roll] [dhcwg] MPL config draft (Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration-01.txt)

Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 12 July 2014 12:37 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 549181B286A; Sat, 12 Jul 2014 05:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9xiR0oJayD82; Sat, 12 Jul 2014 05:37:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-x232.google.com (mail-qa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00A9B1B2866; Sat, 12 Jul 2014 05:37:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id s7so63134qap.23 for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 12 Jul 2014 05:37:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=dTZY3HCOQARl4SuH4Ux6WOdoDOIBfsyNesa+46xWDbY=; b=BlW6m2UtBkXpUh9fzA9llkCvPxfsKDgI4TK7mrfLGMolODsjSLpmD0VYMPcSoFSQ1P 4gTueJvlSLOcaPu0+uUKqH4qu5sSPnfvO1XX8pO47w9Y9iUKm4mGeU8yKg6a+7DueHWM 0jIqHMuS5QAkPI7M410KWKGiqSZmGtrO/sgMSma+/SYUZ+uyNfb5mMJP8Pgt7xfZ6qy+ u7/iMR35+6gwSkPhIyRAPrGWzOlh1SYCcauxbihz8omdnwTTDnqVGVatMblRN0SSmpLr hw3KH3d2JQ5B3MoDbukEpRLo/GOCHjFHvVPMfOod7AbUrD7pVc200L9Tq6kbny3XjL2n e1Jw==
X-Received: by 10.224.3.201 with SMTP id 9mr4947569qao.73.1405168620020; Sat, 12 Jul 2014 05:37:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.20.10.3] (mobile-198-228-204-049.mycingular.net. [198.228.204.49]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 94sm5261082qgu.20.2014.07.12.05.36.57 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 12 Jul 2014 05:36:58 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <43CF020C-1007-40A9-8F58-0B4F64672736@nominum.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 08:36:56 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <3C9237BF-BF7F-43BF-8A12-35CB9BE6E7F1@gmail.com>
References: <20140701155803.14047.81610.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <53BA92D9.3000606@toshiba.co.jp> <CAL10_BqyWcb9_NBq2RzX7oX9g356ypYYDntVASX53q_D7Lrhdg@mail.gmail.com> <53BBA3EF.9040609@toshiba.co.jp> <43CF020C-1007-40A9-8F58-0B4F64672736@nominum.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/voZc8sWk0fllYLiNc1Y0sCCLOtk
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] [dhcwg] MPL config draft (Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration-01.txt)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 12:37:03 -0000

On Jul 10, 2014, at 4:48 PM 7/10/14, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> On Jul 8, 2014, at 3:55 AM, Yusuke DOI <yusuke.doi@toshiba.co.jp> wrote:
>> 1) Typical MAC we're expecting is 50k-200kbps mesh network with 5+ hops.
>> I think a compact option format is more suitable for the case.
> 
> This doesn't sound like something you'd configure with DHCP.

Ted - what does "this" refer to?  MPL in general?

- Ralph