Re: [Roll] Request for Comments for ROLL Charter

Cenk Gündogan <cnkgndgn@gmail.com> Wed, 29 June 2016 15:04 UTC

Return-Path: <cnkgndgn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B04C8128874 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 08:04:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pyLgxw8KM3xn for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 08:04:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com (mail-wm0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A2AE12D0CD for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 08:04:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x229.google.com with SMTP id a66so78206880wme.0 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 08:04:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ElCFkGkJQql17oXKATo+2eL1bFO6Cb+r6G49QJC8t6U=; b=aemcSOL1q2dr616Naq52Hctfl6gZiXVtDOK3cJQe2oCjTLnogJW9Co0EALfMYOTDF3 Vc81uGjDw32L70pYyQtdVZKUM8RM89He2zxHNzrZIq0StpEFW4VEQsklB6p0r7M0usA0 FPGNQkYIJnOc7u4w1+Kny4gmJV+FmZrBJru2rfJFwzOVc0rNkXOGChBnx1KbZB2KYb9Y 4UKOwgjUfnnH5j3w8i3utxUoLyjrt9SZ0vhW5XssF83BC4GMfCr2+49hmnWHsFxBlOyC ygF44BEPRqvCz4spqEq1BC8SZA20mdnCPvek9avp2hH5zTdEQH0maIC1GCYjWXAkMzSi nRmg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ElCFkGkJQql17oXKATo+2eL1bFO6Cb+r6G49QJC8t6U=; b=cm86bFx7LAKgazeBrFXuwxFqakMENEm7KdJ66CPGwTSmlL+rMBhyiwhZLRFaP8Z9aj 1CKqnDbofUg/ZBOK9kcVGnZIT9KnOnxTmK8nzXiX1/2Y4wz94Vug15nZKSKyDCBkxMgJ 81JFrgQjlikXrLDU18wnbZGd3x5GKTW60H2dmBRgiN98tND1UX/IZPp7gJOZkfBVFzo0 nPvcwJhIgzEn20jVyuQKjP8S9QHII3Q6Uc3fn1tY53iuQR1Cax2jkJMYRLt6ddw+luFT 1JI7JtgtcMuFDLpQlyDfDuGCwtIDEceHZ864i1EqdVAEdifKT1urgizZEm5nOipKfXfu 8WYw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLxafgcVPuNV4nQNLjXNBnLBO3qIr7Hxob03+Ew1nMdtNuO3hyNqfNqW0jlUI4xRA==
X-Received: by 10.28.68.67 with SMTP id r64mr9255307wma.57.1467212669790; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 08:04:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.92.124.3] (z5c7c.pia.fu-berlin.de. [87.77.92.124]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id f189sm56850wmf.19.2016.06.29.08.04.28 for <roll@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Jun 2016 08:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
To: roll@ietf.org
References: <CAP+sJUdRQHJhuszRLmMLoObVVELTGKAboPZpjHRV1M1t3T1BpA@mail.gmail.com> <962ecd511f1b4629bcf329790509bb0c@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <17987.1467118035@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <7887a2c930bd4eb3b90da72e2bbe914b@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <ec28f1cd-5f5e-43d9-bfc6-706a8b3116f2@gmail.com> <CAH7SZV-yuc8Zx6NBi_vMHZMFqEwZuKb25hewE2w1CC48yNyZ6Q@mail.gmail.com> <d9eb6a59c4206fe735a69e2d6ba57724@xs4all.nl>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cenk_G=c3=bcndogan?= <cnkgndgn@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <dd7a9d7b-9963-bd5e-3ff5-b271dffe040a@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 17:04:28 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <d9eb6a59c4206fe735a69e2d6ba57724@xs4all.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/wzjKA3gA9eHLxv4-PNu2UkyDKjg>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Request for Comments for ROLL Charter
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 15:04:47 -0000

Hello Peter,

I believe Pascal proposed to keep it in a more generic form 
"improvements to the RPL routing protocol".

Otherwise, read on for my comments regarding the former wording:
I propose we drop any form of uncertainty and change the "and/or" to "and".
Secondly, "packet size" sounds a little bit too generic, how about 
"control packet sizes",
or "RPL related packet sizes"?
Thirdly, would "reduce ... the amount of required routing states"
be a better choice? It hints to a reduction of memory while still 
providing an
operational (converged) DODAG.
The proposed form "reduce ... the amount of accumulated routing states" 
could also
refer to drop states and decrease the quality of the routing protocol 
while doing so.

Cenk

On 06/29/2016 09:05 AM, peter van der Stok wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> If I understand correctly the discussion, the proposal is to replace
>
> "Additional protocol to  reduce paths for RPL in non-storing mode."
>
> by
>
> "Additional protocol elements to reduce packet size and/or the amount 
> of accumulated routing states."
>
> As a side remark:
> I don't like "through the air", Radio also works in vacuum.
+1 (:
>
> Peter
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll