IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] "Charter inclusion: Work in RPL control messages: DIS Mod. - No-Path DAO"

"Caozhen (zcao)" <zhen.cao@huawei.com> Thu, 04 August 2016 09:03 UTC

Return-Path: <zhen.cao@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA48212D789 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 02:03:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.508
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.508 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HUlC5eZIwIY6 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 02:03:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A387212D686 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 02:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id COW31575; Thu, 04 Aug 2016 09:03:47 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEMI403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.75.35) by lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.182) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 10:03:46 +0100
Received: from SZXEMI506-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.194]) by SZXEMI403-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.83.65.55]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 17:03:43 +0800
From: "Caozhen (zcao)" <zhen.cao@huawei.com>
To: "consultancy@vanderstok.org" <consultancy@vanderstok.org>, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Roll] "Charter inclusion: Work in RPL control messages: DIS Mod. - No-Path DAO"
Thread-Index: AQHR5mnzf/q2XeIf1EO4CjWRs3uBiKA4j0Hw
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 09:03:42 +0000
Message-ID: <0ADB5996A09C254EB300AB612DA81508215887F1@SZXEMI506-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <fb3529979afa63487a3f1ace6b6117c6@xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <fb3529979afa63487a3f1ace6b6117c6@xs4all.nl>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.130.152.94]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A0B0207.57A304F3.013C, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.5.194, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 94159e0e1bb864faeb123a5babbe2fbd
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/z8GUhrzOdDh-8a8UaB0ymc3HQrQ>
Subject: Re: [Roll] "Charter inclusion: Work in RPL control messages: DIS Mod. - No-Path DAO"
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 09:03:54 -0000

I would like to support both drafts (I am co-author of the second draft), they are certainly relevant to the wg. 

I can contribute the review of the draft-gundogan-roll-dis-modifications. 

-Zhen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roll [mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of peter van der Stok
> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 7:44 PM
> To: Roll <roll@ietf.org>
> Subject: [Roll] "Charter inclusion: Work in RPL control messages: DIS Mod. -
> No-Path DAO"
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> Following the ROLL Meeting at IETF 96, we would like to know your opinion
> about the drafts, presented during IETF95 and IETF96. This is the first set of
> three emails. The adoption of drafts as WG drafts will be asked independently
> dependent on the status of the draft.
> 
> A: draft-gundogan-roll-dis-modifications-00
>        DIS Modifications
> 
> •    Is the draft relevant to the working group.?
> •    Do you foresee to contribute to the work described in the draft ?
> •    Are you willing to review the draft ?
> •    Should the draft be rejected by the WG ?
> 
> B: draft-jadhav-roll-no-path-dao-ps-01
>        No-Path DAO Problem Statement
> 
> •    Is the draft relevant to the working group.?
> •    Do you foresee to contribute to the work described in the draft ?
> •    Are you willing to review the draft ?
> •    Should the draft be rejected by the WG ?
> 
> 
> It would be nice to know the reasons why you agree or disagree with the drafts
> 
> 
> Thank you very much,
> 
> Peter and Ines
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email