[Roll] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6719 (7772)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 22 January 2024 12:09 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04696C14F5F3 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 04:09:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.658
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.658 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3jifdz3uaKZw for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 04:09:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78F2AC14E513 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 04:09:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 205481939BC6; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 04:09:37 -0800 (PST)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: dominique.barthel@orange.com, gnawali@cs.uh.edu, pal@cs.stanford.edu, roll@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240122120937.205481939BC6@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 04:09:37 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/zl_Zp5MiCrbXKItw8PvoPBwLjMA>
Subject: [Roll] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6719 (7772)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 12:09:42 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6719,
"The Minimum Rank with Hysteresis Objective Function".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7772

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Dominique Barthel <dominique.barthel@orange.com>

Section: 3.3

Original Text
-------------
to covert

Corrected Text
--------------
to convert

Notes
-----
describing the conversion of path cost into a rank value.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it 
will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.

--------------------------------------
RFC6719 (draft-ietf-roll-minrank-hysteresis-of-11)
--------------------------------------
Title               : The Minimum Rank with Hysteresis Objective Function
Publication Date    : September 2012
Author(s)           : O. Gnawali, P. Levis
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG