Discussion topic for Routing Area Open Meeting in Orlando

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 28 February 2013 13:58 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF4421F88A2; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 05:58:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.592
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.592 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.007, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QSHeb7nAN4C5; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 05:58:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (asmtp3.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.159]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495AA21F8881; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 05:58:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r1SDwm0b020089; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 13:58:48 GMT
Received: from 950129200 (089144192031.atnat0001.highway.a1.net [89.144.192.31]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r1SDwUbn019733 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Feb 2013 13:58:47 GMT
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: routing-discussion@ietf.org
Subject: Discussion topic for Routing Area Open Meeting in Orlando
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 13:58:32 -0000
Message-ID: <008701ce15bb$bc87ff20$3597fd60$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac4VqBA9zxE3XKqsRzanD8+wl8QPvg==
Content-Language: en-gb
Cc: draft-mrw-abfab-trust-router@tools.ietf.org, rtg-dir@ietf.org, rtgwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: routing-discussion@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Routing Area General mailing list <routing-discussion.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/routing-discussion>
List-Post: <mailto:routing-discussion@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 13:58:52 -0000

Hi,

In the Routing Area meeting in Orlando we will continue our occasional series of
discussions of "routing in other areas".  In this case we will spend some time
on "Trust Routers".

Although this topic is not about routing packets, the tree construction and
"shortest" path computations have some resemblance to BGP and other routing
protocols, and there are also similarities to the SIP routing issues that we
heard about a while back.  The authors say it would interesting to get some
routing folks involved to make sure we avoid the well-understood pitfalls with
those sorts of algorithms.  It looks to me to me that there are many
commonalities of functional concept even if the environment (i.e. application
space) is free of many of the constraints we see on routers.

As background reading, you might like to look at:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/	

You can also look at two older (i.e., expired) drafts:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-howlett-abfab-trust-router-ps-02
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mrw-abfab-multihop-fed-02

Thanks,
Adrian