Software upgradation time
"Karthikeyan Subramaniam" <keyans@rediffmail.com> Thu, 29 May 2003 07:07 UTC
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA21027 for <routing-discussion-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 29 May 2003 03:07:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4T6xWB27890; Thu, 29 May 2003 02:59:33 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4T6uXB27795 for <routing-discussion@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 29 May 2003 02:56:33 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA20886 for <routing-discussion@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 May 2003 02:56:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19LHJK-0003uz-00 for routing-discussion@ietf.org; Thu, 29 May 2003 02:54:50 -0400
Received: from [203.199.83.148] (helo=rediffmail.com) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 19LHJJ-0003uq-00 for routing-discussion@ietf.org; Thu, 29 May 2003 02:54:49 -0400
Received: (qmail 32043 invoked by uid 510); 29 May 2003 06:54:08 -0000
Message-ID: <20030529065408.32042.qmail@webmail26.rediffmail.com>
Received: from unknown (203.200.20.226) by rediffmail.com via HTTP; 29 may 2003 06:54:08 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Karthikeyan Subramaniam <keyans@rediffmail.com>
Reply-To: Karthikeyan Subramaniam <keyans@rediffmail.com>
To: routing-discussion@ietf.org
Subject: Software upgradation time
Content-type: text/plain; format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: routing-discussion-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: routing-discussion-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: routing-discussion@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Routing Area General mailing list <routing-discussion.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:routing-discussion@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/routing-discussion/>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 06:54:08 -0000
Hi,
I have doubt about restart timer value in protocols.
In OSPF default restart timer is specified as 120 seconds in the
draft
"draft-ietf-ospf-hitless-restart-07.txt" and in the case of BGP
default
restart timer should not be greater than the HOLDTIME(suggested
value as
per RFC 1771 is 90 secs)carried in OPEN.
Can control software be upgraded within 120/90 seconds? On what
basis
this timer value has been fixed?
with regards,
S.Karthikeyan.
___________________________________________________
Get www. mycompany .com and 5 matching email ids.
Just Rs. 1499/ year.
Click here http://www.rediffmailpro.com
_______________________________________________
routing-discussion mailing list
routing-discussion@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion
- Software upgradation time Karthikeyan Subramaniam
- Re: Software upgradation time Acee Lindem