Re: BABEL Side Meeting (Th Jul/22 @ 2030)

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Thu, 23 July 2015 05:51 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 680861A6FEF for <routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 22:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qO5ljD35Ueiq for <routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 22:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B84B81A6F28 for <routing-discussion@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 22:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5359; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1437630711; x=1438840311; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=O9LygK/Avl5pPcsp2PpAMOn57KJ0IYXZ5zVRey0GPXA=; b=MP8nJIxfWbVuOkVQS9HYffOLZUaGG+dJsNoDQE2Zo1iro0EjNN5KUlBB PqGHNbEGpDmjLaXAMV9B3YgBpU4JnO2h9FcyquKR4R0JQPHC7XtrnZhKq KHNgA/Ze4wj3xH8p1C9XEQzDF3xT0lWbbfkcwv6mPFVerJu1/NqotdOm+ A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AcAwCIgLBV/4UNJK1bgkhNgT0Gu0IJh3YCgVo4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQkAQEEbRwCAQg/BzIUEQIEARIUiBrNBAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAReLTIE9g1CEKwWRYoJ6AYw0mRgmY4E3gWJvgUeBBAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.15,528,1432598400"; d="scan'208,217"; a="12272680"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Jul 2015 05:51:50 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com [173.36.12.82]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t6N5poEM001928 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 23 Jul 2015 05:51:50 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com ([169.254.9.225]) by xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com ([173.36.12.82]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:51:50 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, 'Alia Atlas' <akatlas@gmail.com>, "routing-discussion@ietf.org" <routing-discussion@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: BABEL Side Meeting (Th Jul/22 @ 2030)
Thread-Topic: BABEL Side Meeting (Th Jul/22 @ 2030)
Thread-Index: AQHQxMip3wiKGYRSsk6mqPe4fYrCHZ3ocbGAgACRaYA=
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 05:51:50 +0000
Message-ID: <D1D64640.C1FA0%aretana@cisco.com>
References: <CAG4d1rfo5CKJyqxZkv0qcgew+epwK+wXXd9LLUKx5V+L93+2Mw@mail.gmail.com> <CAG4d1rcXv76Vym2b96u=Yai7sfNmWMZ5jymmqSsH6hpBesOO0g@mail.gmail.com> <03e401d0c4d3$b9768440$2c638cc0$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <03e401d0c4d3$b9768440$2c638cc0$@olddog.co.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.61.193.85]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D1D64640C1FA0aretanaciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/routing-discussion/F_WyGiFHplCej90z4Oj_7A5CcQ0>
X-BeenThere: routing-discussion@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area General mailing list <routing-discussion.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/routing-discussion/>
List-Post: <mailto:routing-discussion@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 05:51:53 -0000

On 7/23/15, 1:11 AM, "routing-discussion on behalf of Adrian Farrel" <routing-discussion-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:routing-discussion-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of adrian@olddog.co.uk<mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk>> wrote:

Adrian:

Hi!

This side meeting is tonight — Thursday.

I'd be interested to know what "standardisation" means.
Does it mean "clean up the existing documentation of the current implementations and publish as RFC(s) on the Standards Track"?
Or does it mean "hand the protocol over to the IETF to be reviewed, revised, and potentially given a new protocol revision in a non-backwards-compatible improvement"?

For tonight we mostly want to take advantage of the fact that people who might be interested in learning a little about BABEL are still in Prague  in person.  The presentation/discussion will be focused on a technical overview.

You’re right, standardization can mean many things.  In this particular case, I don’t think anyone can answer that question at this point. By knowing more about the protocol, I personally hope that the community can then help us determine the proper level of interest, if any.  Again, the only focus tonight is on a technical overview.

Thanks!

Alvaro.