Re: fast protocol hellos

Alvaro Retana <aretana@cisco.com> Fri, 01 November 2002 14:17 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA10195 for <routing-discussion-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 09:17:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA1ECHv00735; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 09:12:17 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA1E8dv30819 for <routing-discussion@optimus.ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 09:08:39 -0500
Received: from sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA07856 for <routing-discussion@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 09:06:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from aretana-u10.cisco.com (aretana-u10.cisco.com [64.102.48.77]) by sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id gA1E8WPQ015637 for <routing-discussion@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 06:08:33 -0800 (PST)
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana@cisco.com>
To: routing-discussion@ietf.org
Subject: Re: fast protocol hellos
In-Reply-To: <20021030110959.F88824-100000@kummer.juniper.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0211010856460.23239-100000@aretana-u10.cisco.com>
X-Save: no
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: routing-discussion-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: routing-discussion-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: routing-discussion@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Routing Area General mailing list <routing-discussion.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:routing-discussion@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/routing-discussion/>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 09:08:32 -0500

Hi!  While we're on this subject...

We recently submited a draft on what we call MARP -- MultiAccess
Reachability Protocol -- yes, the *name* kindda sucks (no relationship to
ARP)...but we're open to suggestions. ;-)

MARP addresses some of the same things that have been discussed in this
thread, but more specifically fast L2 failure detection/notification.
The traditional approach to detect neighbor failures (or L1/L2 failures -
on multiaccess networks, for example) has been to send/receive "fast
hellos".  MARP takes an "event driven" approach: it facilitates the
notification of *loss of L2 reachability*, which translates into not being
able to reach your L3 peers.  We believe that the application extends not
only to routing protocols...pls take a look:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-retana-marp-00.txt

Any/all comments are welcome. :-)

TIA,

Alvaro.

_______________________________________________
routing-discussion mailing list
routing-discussion@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion