Semantic Networking Drafts
Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sat, 22 October 2022 15:34 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73EF7C15257C; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 08:34:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.605
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.605 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2V3JypvSnrH8; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 08:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta5.iomartmail.com (mta5.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C58C5C1522C9; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 08:34:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (vs3.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.124]) by mta5.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 29MFYhjw024376; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 16:34:43 +0100
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41BB4604B; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 16:34:42 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D85874604A; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 16:34:42 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs3.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 16:34:42 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (231.197.bbplus.pte-ag1.dyn.plus.net [81.174.197.231] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 29MFYgdL014035 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 22 Oct 2022 16:34:42 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Routing WG' <rtgwg@ietf.org>, routing-discussion@ietf.org
Subject: Semantic Networking Drafts
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 16:34:41 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <050801d8e62b$cdef8bc0$69cea340$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdjmKgYuGMGAvexzRsCmoZCc8tNSlA==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 81.174.197.231
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-27218.001
X-TM-AS-Result: No--4.921-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--4.921-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-27218.001
X-TMASE-Result: 10--4.920800-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: oO9J74suo7YOwAmmWH5kBLJpcu2XCdkceLLCA0PD7agvfU/riSJXkQTJ /mnBtOQOGdxXfy3gg65O9LReDddkKPTPTYKNobBkjzeQxKnNxBz2kudi1D33Em1/OiWPM9c7gvQ yi2H06sNzK84s8azN3jHmYEc6SmWzcxAn5xDcNfVPtFVFuufzC8trR4A0Ts3Pyct1yTgedaiETM jf6aTOJ+8+tYH+bsNf64sVlliWKx9Nfs8n85Te8v7E6GNqs6cep8rFvqI5S/ew7M6dyuYKg46HM 5rqDwqt0sCFtrx6AEn0Up6VmUi3BPEPK4BYZDnAhHomhZQNQMmNGC+uoypb6g==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/routing-discussion/_BnZGvtSkFUCuT7aTpRAf-C8oP4>
X-BeenThere: routing-discussion@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area General Discussion list <routing-discussion.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/routing-discussion/>
List-Post: <mailto:routing-discussion@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 15:34:51 -0000
Hi, After the discussions at the interim in June and with the ADs at IETF-114, we have kept a lowish profile within the IETF for our work on Semantic Networking. But we had a useful workshop at SigComm on the Future of Internet Routing and Addressing, and that prompted us to not give up on our drafts. We've just reposted two of the key drafts, renaming them from -irtf- to -rtgwg- to better show the venue for discussion. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-king-rtgwg-challenges-in-routing/ provides a discussion, motivated by proposals for Semantic Networking, of the considerations of how new proposals and techniques in routing and forwarding should be considered. This draft is, hopefully, useful across the whole area. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farrel-rtgwg-intro-to-semantic-networ king/ gives a brief overview and introduction to what we are calling Semantic Networking. As usual, comments and thoughts would be most welcome. Discussion is better limited to the Routing Discussion list so as not to gum up the RTGWG list. Cheers, Adrian -- It's Christmas. Treat someone you love to a fairy story. Books of fairy tales for adults of all ages: . Tales from the Wood . More Tales from the Wood . Tales from Beyond the Wood . Tales from the Castle Get them on line https://www.feedaread.com/profiles/8604/ Get them from me at IETF-115 in London Or buy a signed copy from me by post
- Semantic Networking Drafts Adrian Farrel