Re: WG Review: Routing Area Working Group (rtgwg)

[Alex Zinin <[e-mail]>]

Avri,

 In fact, we did. The announcement lost them for some reason.
 Here we go:

>  Goals and Milestones:
> 
>    Mar 2004 Submit draft on calculation of IGP routes over TE tunnels
>                          to IESG for publication as Informational RFC
> 
>  Internet-drafts
> 
>    draft-hsmit-mpls-igp-spf-01.txt
> 
>  Request For Comments:
> 
>  RFC-draft-gill-gtsh-04.txt (RFC3682)


-- 
Alex
http://www.psg.com/~zinin/

Tuesday, February 17, 2004, 4:42:32 PM, [e-mail] wrote:
> Seems like a good idea.

> I am wondering whether you might not want to add some initial 
> tasks/milestones, however, since I figure there must be some work you 
> want the RTGWG  to start off with.

> a.

> On 18 feb 2004, at 00.35, Alex Zinin wrote:

>> Folks-
>>
>>  As the charter says, we would like to create this "generic" routing
>>  WG to give home to smaller work items that don't fit in existing WGs
>>  and are not big enough for their own ones, such as BTSH, or
>>  draft-hsmit-mpls-igp-spf-01.txt. Transport area has some positive
>>  experience with TSVWG, which RTGWG was modeled after.
>>
>> -- 
>> Alex
>> http://www.psg.com/~zinin/
>>
>> This is a forwarded message
>> From: The IESG <[e-mail]>
>> To:
>> Cc:
>> Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2004, 6:38:43 AM
>> Subject: WG Review: Routing Area Working Group (rtgwg)
>>
>> ===8<==============Original message text===============
>> A new IETF working group has been proposed in the Routing Area. The 
>> IESG has not made
>> any determination as yet. The following description was submitted, and 
>> is provided for
>> informational purposes only. Please send your comments to the IESG 
>> mailing list
>> ([e-mail]) by February 19.
>>
>>
>> Routing Area Working Group (rtgwg)
>> ----------------------------------
>>
>>  Current Status: Proposed Working Group
>>
>>  Description of Working Group:
>>
>>  The Routing area receives occasional proposals for the development and
>>  publication of RFCs dealing with routing topics, but for which the
>>  required work does not rise to the level where a new working group is
>>  justified, yet the topic does not fit with an existing working group,
>>  and a single BOF would not provide the time to ensure a mature
>>  proposal. The rtgwg will serve as the forum for developing these types
>>  of proposals.
>>
>>  The rtgwg mailing list will be used to discuss the proposals as they
>>  arise. The working group will meet if there are one or more active
>>  proposals that require discussion.
>>
>>  The working group milestones will be updated as needed to reflect the
>>  proposals currently being worked on and the target dates for their
>>  completion. New milestones will be first reviewed by the IESG. The
>>  working group will be on-going as long as the ADs believe it serves a
>>  useful purpose.
>>
>>
>>
>> ===8<===========End of original message text===========
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> routing-discussion mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion
>>


> _______________________________________________
> routing-discussion mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion


_______________________________________________
routing-discussion mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion