Re: Routing Area YANG Coordinators Wiki

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Thu, 23 July 2015 21:22 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 580D81ACE55 for <routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yXvbi0EEeC-e for <routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D77FA1ACE49 for <routing-discussion@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [31.133.139.48] (unknown [31.133.139.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F70D18013E2; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 23:22:19 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <55B15B06.2010101@pi.nu>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 23:22:14 +0200
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>, David Sinicrope <david.sinicrope@ericsson.com>, "routing-discussion@ietf.org" <routing-discussion@ietf.org>, "Qin Wu (bill.wu@huawei.com)" <bill.wu@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: Routing Area YANG Coordinators Wiki
References: <D1D3CEC6.190CBB%david.sinicrope@ericsson.com> <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11221882A09@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11221882A09@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/routing-discussion/g4Q1kDu7a9KtQSKT7o5pPGq-8LQ>
X-BeenThere: routing-discussion@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area General mailing list <routing-discussion.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/routing-discussion/>
List-Post: <mailto:routing-discussion@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 21:22:23 -0000

David and Qin,

One more question related to the table. The column third from the right
says "Announced on the coordination list"; which list and what action?

/Loa

On 2015-07-23 15:37, Gregory Mirsky wrote:
> Hi David and Bill,
>
> I’ve reviewed the table and wonder why some YANG models of OAM tagged
> differently. For example, MPLS-TP OAM YANG model tagged as related to
> LIME, BFD – as OAM related and TWAMP as Measurement related. While all
> three are correct references all three equally apply to these models as
> BFD and TWAMP are OAM protocols and are relevant for work of LIME WG.
> Personally, I think that reference to OAM would be the most generic and
> still correct.
>
>                  Regards,
>
>                                  Greg
>
> *From:*routing-discussion [mailto:routing-discussion-bounces@ietf.org]
> *On Behalf Of *David Sinicrope
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 21, 2015 4:22 PM
> *To:* routing-discussion@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Routing Area YANG Coordinators Wiki
>
> Hi All,
>
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgYangCoord
>
> Above is a link to the Routing Area YANG Coordinators area that was
> established earlier this year to help track the YANG models being
> developed in the iETF Routing Area.
>
> There are a number of resources on the wiki pages, but the coordinators
> would like to draw attention specifically to the “Summary of Routing
> Area YANG Drafts”
>
> (The section with the big red text "** == YANG MODEL AUTHORS LOOK HERE
> == ***”*
>
> These tables are intended to help summarize and track the YANG drafts in
> the Routing Area.    Draft authors and WG Chairs are requested to keep
> the wiki table updated as drafts are created and progressed through the
> document development process.  Instructions for completing a table row
> for a YANG model draft are provided.
>
> Questions on the instructions should be directed to the Routing Area
> YANG Coordinators (Qin Wu​bill.wu@huawei.com
> <mailto:bill.wu@huawei.com> and David Sinicrope
> david.sinicrope@ericsson.com <mailto:david.sinicrope@ericsson.com> )
>
> Thanks for your help and support keeping this information up to date.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dave and Qin
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> routing-discussion mailing list
> routing-discussion@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion
>