Re: Routing Area YANG Coordinators Wiki
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Thu, 23 July 2015 21:22 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 580D81ACE55 for <routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yXvbi0EEeC-e for <routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D77FA1ACE49 for <routing-discussion@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [31.133.139.48] (unknown [31.133.139.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F70D18013E2; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 23:22:19 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <55B15B06.2010101@pi.nu>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 23:22:14 +0200
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>, David Sinicrope <david.sinicrope@ericsson.com>, "routing-discussion@ietf.org" <routing-discussion@ietf.org>, "Qin Wu (bill.wu@huawei.com)" <bill.wu@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: Routing Area YANG Coordinators Wiki
References: <D1D3CEC6.190CBB%david.sinicrope@ericsson.com> <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11221882A09@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11221882A09@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/routing-discussion/g4Q1kDu7a9KtQSKT7o5pPGq-8LQ>
X-BeenThere: routing-discussion@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area General mailing list <routing-discussion.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/routing-discussion/>
List-Post: <mailto:routing-discussion@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 21:22:23 -0000
David and Qin, One more question related to the table. The column third from the right says "Announced on the coordination list"; which list and what action? /Loa On 2015-07-23 15:37, Gregory Mirsky wrote: > Hi David and Bill, > > I’ve reviewed the table and wonder why some YANG models of OAM tagged > differently. For example, MPLS-TP OAM YANG model tagged as related to > LIME, BFD – as OAM related and TWAMP as Measurement related. While all > three are correct references all three equally apply to these models as > BFD and TWAMP are OAM protocols and are relevant for work of LIME WG. > Personally, I think that reference to OAM would be the most generic and > still correct. > > Regards, > > Greg > > *From:*routing-discussion [mailto:routing-discussion-bounces@ietf.org] > *On Behalf Of *David Sinicrope > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 21, 2015 4:22 PM > *To:* routing-discussion@ietf.org > *Subject:* Routing Area YANG Coordinators Wiki > > Hi All, > > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgYangCoord > > Above is a link to the Routing Area YANG Coordinators area that was > established earlier this year to help track the YANG models being > developed in the iETF Routing Area. > > There are a number of resources on the wiki pages, but the coordinators > would like to draw attention specifically to the “Summary of Routing > Area YANG Drafts” > > (The section with the big red text "** == YANG MODEL AUTHORS LOOK HERE > == ***”* > > These tables are intended to help summarize and track the YANG drafts in > the Routing Area. Draft authors and WG Chairs are requested to keep > the wiki table updated as drafts are created and progressed through the > document development process. Instructions for completing a table row > for a YANG model draft are provided. > > Questions on the instructions should be directed to the Routing Area > YANG Coordinators (Qin Wubill.wu@huawei.com > <mailto:bill.wu@huawei.com> and David Sinicrope > david.sinicrope@ericsson.com <mailto:david.sinicrope@ericsson.com> ) > > Thanks for your help and support keeping this information up to date. > > Thanks, > > Dave and Qin > > > > _______________________________________________ > routing-discussion mailing list > routing-discussion@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion >
- Routing Area YANG Coordinators Wiki David Sinicrope
- RE: Routing Area YANG Coordinators Wiki Gregory Mirsky
- Re: Routing Area YANG Coordinators Wiki Loa Andersson
- Re: Routing Area YANG Coordinators Wiki David Sinicrope
- RE: Routing Area YANG Coordinators Wiki Qin Wu
- RE: Routing Area YANG Coordinators Wiki Gregory Mirsky
- RE: Routing Area YANG Coordinators Wiki Qin Wu