RE: Differentiated Routing, not only plain rambo-SPF
"Naidu, Venkata" <Venkata.Naidu@marconi.com> Mon, 05 August 2002 19:44 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA29090 for <routing-discussion-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 15:44:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA25125; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 15:33:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA25095 for <routing-discussion@optimus.ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 15:33:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailgate.pit.comms.marconi.com (mailgate.pit.comms.marconi.com [169.144.68.6]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA28745 for <routing-discussion@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 15:32:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com (mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com [169.144.2.12]) by mailgate.pit.comms.marconi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA15672; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 15:33:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from whq-msgrtr-01.pit.comms.marconi.com (whq-msgrtr-01.pit.comms.marconi.com [169.144.2.221]) by mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA00081; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 15:33:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by whq-msgrtr-01.pit.comms.marconi.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <3W99NATJ>; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 15:33:16 -0400
Message-ID: <39469E08BD83D411A3D900204840EC557632B5@vie-msgusr-01.dc.fore.com>
From: "Naidu, Venkata" <Venkata.Naidu@marconi.com>
To: "'Ayyasamy, Senthilkumar (UMKC-Student)'" <saq66@umkc.edu>, Hummel Heinrich <Heinrich.Hummel@icn.siemens.de>
Cc: jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu, fred@cisco.com, irtf-rr@puck.nether.net, routing-discussion@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Differentiated Routing, not only plain rambo-SPF
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2002 15:33:15 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: routing-discussion-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: routing-discussion-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Routing Area General mailing list <routing-discussion.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: routing-discussion@ietf.org
Senthil, -> > There is no difference between MPLS-TE and -> DiffServ-aware-MPLS-> TE? In other -> > words, are you saying that Differv-aware-MPLS-TE -> > is notgoing solve ANY problem that MPLS-TE alone couldn't -> > solve ? -> I was just talking about diffserv aware MPLS TE which is -> more related to -> the context of discussion. The authors of diffserv MPLS TE -> draft discusses scalability problems. Yes! I am also talking about DiffServ-aware-MPLS-TE. In the draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-reqts-05.txt authors clearly mentioned about problem statement and how we can benefit from DiffServ-aware-MPLS-TE (even if there are some scalability issues). Effectively, authors are trying to solve SOME problem - then how can you can say that DiffServ-aware-MPLS-TE (aka DiffRouting) is not going to solve ANY problem. Scalability issues in TOS Routing are different from scalability issues in DiffRouting (if you consider TOS routing is applicable in traditional hop-by-hop routing case and DiffRouting is applicable in todays source routing cases). Finally, let me conclude what I agree and disagree with you. What I agree: - None of these approaches [traditional TOS-Routing or DiffRouting (DiffServ-aware-MPLS-TE)] really solve end-to-end QoS/Performance. I already expressed this concern to Fred Baker (which he concluded that as an open ended question) - which is fine! http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/routing-discussion/current/ msg00060.html - None of the above approaches are complete. They have some common and some different issues - for example scalability etc etc What I don't agree (my view): - Just because a solution has scalability issues doesn't mean that that solution is not going to solve ANY problem. - Diffserv-aware-MPLS-TE is trying to solve different problems which we couldn't solve with traditional routing approaches *easily* in the past. - We are trying to solve (we will solve) those scalability issues in source routing (using hierarchical TE etc etc) in future. Do you agree? If not let me know - let us discuss :) If you still feel that DiffRouting is not going to solve ANY problem then I will ask authors of draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-reqts-05.txt (for clarification). Finally, you didn't tell me in what other approaches we can solve the same issues that the DiffServ-TE is trying to solve (with out letting control plane know, with out CSPF, with out connection-oriented MPLS etc etc). -- Venkata _______________________________________________ routing-discussion mailing list routing-discussion@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion
- Differentiated Routing, not only plain rambo-SPF Hummel Heinrich
- Re: Differentiated Routing, not only plain rambo-… Fred Baker
- RE: Differentiated Routing, not only plain rambo-… Naidu, Venkata
- RE: Differentiated Routing, not only plain rambo-… Naidu, Venkata
- RE: Differentiated Routing, not only plain rambo-… Fred Baker
- RE: Differentiated Routing, not only plain rambo-… Ayyasamy, Senthilkumar (UMKC-Student)
- RE: Differentiated Routing, not only plain rambo-… Ayyasamy, Senthilkumar (UMKC-Student)
- RE: Differentiated Routing, not only plain rambo-… Anders.P.Bergsten
- RE: Differentiated Routing, not only plain rambo-… Ayyasamy, Senthilkumar (UMKC-Student)
- RE: Differentiated Routing, not only plain rambo-… Ayyasamy, Senthilkumar (UMKC-Student)
- RE: Differentiated Routing, not only plain rambo-… Naidu, Venkata
- RE: Differentiated Routing, not only plain rambo-… Naidu, Venkata
- RE: Differentiated Routing, not only plain rambo-… Ayyasamy, Senthilkumar (UMKC-Student)
- RE: Differentiated Routing, not only plain rambo-… Naidu, Venkata
- RE: Differentiated Routing, not only plain rambo-… Naidu
- RE: Differentiated Routing, not only plain rambo-… Ayyasamy, Senthilkumar (UMKC-Student)
- RE: Differentiated Routing, not only plain rambo-… Naidu, Venkata
- RE: Differentiated Routing, not only plain rambo-… Ayyasamy, Senthilkumar (UMKC-Student)
- RE: Differentiated Routing, not only plain rambo-… Ayyasamy, Senthilkumar (UMKC-Student)
- RE: Differentiated Routing, not only plain rambo-… Naidu, Venkata
- RE: Differentiated Routing, not only plain rambo-… Ayyasamy, Senthilkumar (UMKC-Student)
- Re: Differentiated Routing, not only plain rambo-… Ibrahim Matta
- RE: Differentiated Routing, not only plain rambo-… Ayyasamy, Senthilkumar (UMKC-Student)