the more things change, the more they stay the same (last mile problem...)
David Meyer <dmm@1-4-5.net> Tue, 08 July 2003 16:39 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA29909 for <routing-discussion-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 12:39:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19ZvUa-0004pQ-TZ; Tue, 08 Jul 2003 12:39:00 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19ZvUC-0004p3-B2 for routing-discussion@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 08 Jul 2003 12:38:36 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA29876 for <routing-discussion@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 12:38:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19ZvUA-0003Qi-00 for routing-discussion@ietf.org; Tue, 08 Jul 2003 12:38:34 -0400
Received: from sith.maoz.com ([205.167.76.10]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19ZvUA-0003Qa-00 for routing-discussion@ietf.org; Tue, 08 Jul 2003 12:38:34 -0400
Received: (from dmm@localhost) by sith.maoz.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id h68GcHRt001037; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 09:38:17 -0700
From: David Meyer <dmm@1-4-5.net>
To: mtp@shepfarm.com
Cc: mboned@network-services.uoregon.edu, wg-multicast@internet2.edu, routing-discussion@ietf.org
Subject: the more things change, the more they stay the same (last mile problem...)
Message-ID: <20030708093817.A1010@1-4-5.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
X-public-key: http://www.maoz.com/~dmm/public-key.asc
X-philosophy: "I just had to let it go" -- John Lennon
Sender: routing-discussion-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: routing-discussion-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: routing-discussion@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Routing Area General mailing list <routing-discussion.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:routing-discussion@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/routing-discussion/>
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 09:38:17 -0700
It just occurred to me that the first draft I wrote in MBONED outlined the inter-domain problems we were having deploying multicast (many/all of which seem to still exist, sadly), and that a similar exercise may be useful in the context of the last mile problem. Further, it seems that some of the issues outlined in that (now ancient) draft apply to the last mile problem. See http://www.1-4-5.net/~dmm/draft-ietf-mboned-imrp-some-issues-01.txt Dave [Maybe I should update this one...] _______________________________________________ routing-discussion mailing list routing-discussion@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion