draft-farrel-rtg-manageability-requirements-01.txt

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 01 November 2005 13:35 UTC

Message-ID: <00e901c5dee8$5bfcf2d0$4e919ed9@Puppy>
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: routing-discussion@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 11:42:45 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: draft-farrel-rtg-manageability-requirements-01.txt
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Sender: routing-discussion-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: routing-discussion-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,

Following some mild interest two IETF's ago, we have updated this I-D.

The chief change is some fleshing out of the guidance for the content of
mandatory manageability sections, and the inclusion of an example from a
current I-D.

It seems to me that the Routing Area (under guidance of its ADs) now needs
to decide whether this is something we pursue and turn into a rule
(completing all of the details), or whether we should abandon the idea.

Thanks,
Adrian


_______________________________________________
routing-discussion mailing list
routing-discussion@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion

draft-farrel-rtg-manageability-requirements-01.txt Adrian Farrel
Re: draft-farrel-rtg-manageability-requirements-0… JP Vasseur
Progressing: draft-farrel-rtg-manageability-requi… Adrian Farrel