[rpat] sourcecode type question
Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com> Thu, 21 December 2023 17:54 UTC
Return-Path: <jmahoney@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: rpat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rpat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF1CC14CF01 for <rpat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:54:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tPo-4VII9HaJ for <rpat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:54:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CAE4C14F616 for <rpat@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:54:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EAD0424B455 for <rpat@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:54:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yK1vSKgCJoai for <rpat@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:54:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.203] (unknown [47.186.48.51]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DD50424B432 for <rpat@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:54:23 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <b2748dc7-6973-49d3-99dd-26263db00dbc@amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 11:54:22 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: rpat@rfc-editor.org
From: Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rpat/rzhREHv1GCS9Fr5wQk4eIs0uz-E>
Subject: [rpat] sourcecode type question
X-BeenThere: rpat@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Production Advisory Team - Provides operational advice to the RFC Production Center <rpat.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rpat>, <mailto:rpat-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rpat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rpat@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rpat-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rpat>, <mailto:rpat-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 17:54:28 -0000
RPAT, draft-urn-ddi-06 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-urn-ddi-06> specifies a syntax for a URN namespace in two different ways: using ABNF (see Section 3.1.2) and using regular expressions (see Section 3.1.3). We have tagged the ABNF <sourcecode type="abnf">. What sourcecode type should be used in Section 3.1.3? Although it does use regex, it's not just regex. Should the type just be left blank? Thanks! Jean
- [rpat] sourcecode type question Jean Mahoney