IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RPSEC] Agenda for December IETF

sandy@tislabs.com (Sandy Murphy) Fri, 28 September 2007 18:38 UTC

Return-path: <rpsec-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IbKj9-0003ak-1v; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:38:15 -0400
Received: from rpsec by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IbKj7-0003ad-JH for rpsec-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:38:13 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IbKj7-0003aV-8o for rpsec@ietf.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:38:13 -0400
Received: from sentry.gw.tislabs.com ([192.94.214.100] helo=nutshell.tislabs.com) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IbKj5-0000FV-Cb for rpsec@ietf.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:38:13 -0400
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by nutshell.tislabs.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id l8SIZmBP013973; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:35:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pecan.tislabs.com(10.66.1.30) by nutshell.tislabs.com via csmap (V6.0) id srcAAAbPaWpB; Fri, 28 Sep 07 14:35:32 -0400
Received: by pecan.tislabs.com (Postfix, from userid 2005) id 5D26B3F470; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:36:21 -0400 (EDT)
To: riw@cisco.com, rpsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [RPSEC] Agenda for December IETF
In-Reply-To: <46FC4BC3.3020404@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <20070928183621.5D26B3F470@pecan.tislabs.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:36:21 -0400
From: sandy@tislabs.com
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Cc: sandy@tislabs.com
X-BeenThere: rpsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Protocol Security Requirements <rpsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>, <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/rpsec>
List-Post: <mailto:rpsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>, <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: rpsec-bounces@ietf.org

>The two we already have are finishing up the
>BGP req's doc

Finishing up???  I didn't think there was any more work to be done,
but some re-wording of a couple sections.  I just checked the minutes
and that seems to be what was said in the meeting.  The minutes even say 
that the question was asked "do these changes get us to last call?" and the
answer was "think so, will check with co-chair".

So did the check with co-chair reveal some problems that would not
be fixed with the few section edits we spoke of?

There's two months until the IETF.  It seems to me that we should be
able to revise the few places that need revision and go to WGLC.
Before the meeting.

It sure would be good to have this completed.  We've been 96-97-98-99-99 44/100%
done for a very long time.

--Sandy


_______________________________________________
RPSEC mailing list
RPSEC@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email