IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RPSEC] Basis of Requirements?

Sandy Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> Wed, 28 September 2005 12:40 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EKbEo-0006Xu-Mk; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:40:42 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EKbEm-0006XO-1A for rpsec@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:40:40 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA03251 for <rpsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:40:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ns1.tislabs.com ([192.94.214.100] helo=nutshell.tislabs.com ident=firewall-user) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EKbMC-0003X4-2w for rpsec@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:48:22 -0400
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by nutshell.tislabs.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id j8SCaEhB029675 for <rpsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:36:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from filbert.tislabs.com(10.66.1.10) by nutshell.tislabs.com via csmap (V6.0) id srcAAATKaG85; Wed, 28 Sep 05 08:36:11 -0400
Received: (from sandy@localhost) by tislabs.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id j8SCc438011883; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:38:04 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:38:04 -0400
From: Sandy Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
Message-Id: <200509281238.j8SCc438011883@tislabs.com>
To: paul@clubi.ie, tony.li@tony.li
Subject: Re: [RPSEC] Basis of Requirements?
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7bac9cb154eb5790ae3b2913587a40de
Cc: rpsec@ietf.org, kent@bbn.com
X-BeenThere: rpsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Protocol Security Requirements <rpsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>, <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/rpsec>
List-Post: <mailto:rpsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>, <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: rpsec-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: rpsec-bounces@ietf.org

>Well, the _intent_ of the document is that the AS_PATH contain _all_
>of the ASes.  This is obviously necessary for loop avoidance.

Yes, as Russ White et all say in draft-white-pathconsiderations-05.txt:

>path vector
>protocols, such as [BGP], prove a path is loop free by carrying a
>list of nodes the advertisement itself has traversed.

--Sandy

_______________________________________________
RPSEC mailing list
RPSEC@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email