for the record...

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 04 April 1995 01:16 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04770; 3 Apr 95 21:16 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04766; 3 Apr 95 21:16 EDT
Received: from venera.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19118; 3 Apr 95 21:16 EDT
Received: from stilton.cisco.com by venera.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-21) id <AA26915>; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 18:04:26 -0700
Received: (fred@localhost) by stilton.cisco.com (8.6.8+c/8.6.5) id SAA26648 for rreq@isi.edu; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 18:04:25 -0700
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 1995 18:04:25 -0700
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <199504040104.SAA26648@stilton.cisco.com>
To: rreq@isi.edu
Subject: for the record...

the following change was accepted in this evening's working group meeting.
I will post the document before the end of the week.

9c9
< Document Revision 2.06
---
> Document Revision 2.07
11c11
< draft-ietf-rreq-cidr-02.txt
---
> draft-ietf-rreq-cidr-03.txt
14c14
< 3/30/95
---
> 4/3/95
23,24c23,24
< Please also mention the date of this draft (3/30/95)
< and the revision level (2.06).
---
> Please also mention the date of this draft (4/3/95)
> and the revision level (2.07).
7801,7802c7801,7807
< The router SHOULD require a password or other valid authentication before
< permitting remote reconfiguration.
---
> The router SHOULD require  valid authentication before permitting remote reconfiguration.
> This authentication procedure SHOULD NOT transmit the authentication secret over the network.
> For example,
> if telnet is implemented,
> the vendor SHOULD IMPLEMENT Kerberos,
> S-Key,
> or a similar authentication procedure.