Re: updated nexthop
Fred Baker <firstname.lastname@example.org> Wed, 04 January 1995 23:38 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11193;
4 Jan 95 18:38 EST
Received: from [220.127.116.11] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11189; 4 Jan 95 18:38 EST
Received: from venera.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12526; 4 Jan 95 18:38 EST
Received: from stilton.cisco.com by venera.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-20) id <AA20359>; Wed, 4 Jan 1995 15:12:15 -0800
Received: from [18.104.22.168] ([22.214.171.124]) by stilton.cisco.com (8.6.8+c/CISCO.SERVER.1.1) with SMTP id PAA19321; Wed, 4 Jan 1995 15:12:09 -0800
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 1995 15:12:09 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Fred Baker <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: updated nexthop
At 8:31 PM 1/4/95, bmanning@ISI.EDU wrote: > Here is a minor tweek on Philips Next Hop paper. Although Fred has > added many of these ideas into the existing doc, there are at least two > other RFCs that reference this paper directly. Would there be any > problem w/ sending this on the informational track? "Fred" above should read "Frank". He did a lot of work in this regard. Yes, I would suggest you ship it off and post it.