Re: updated nexthop

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Wed, 04 January 1995 23:38 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11193; 4 Jan 95 18:38 EST
Received: from [132.151.1.1] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11189; 4 Jan 95 18:38 EST
Received: from venera.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12526; 4 Jan 95 18:38 EST
Received: from stilton.cisco.com by venera.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-20) id <AA20359>; Wed, 4 Jan 1995 15:12:15 -0800
Received: from [198.92.24.2] ([198.92.24.2]) by stilton.cisco.com (8.6.8+c/CISCO.SERVER.1.1) with SMTP id PAA19321; Wed, 4 Jan 1995 15:12:09 -0800
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 1995 15:12:09 -0800
X-Sender: fred@stilton.cisco.com
Message-Id: <v02110107ab30645cc191@[198.92.24.2]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: bmanning@isi.edu
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: updated nexthop
Cc: rreq@isi.edu

At 8:31 PM 1/4/95, bmanning@ISI.EDU wrote:
>        Here is a minor tweek on Philips Next Hop paper.  Although Fred has
>        added many of these ideas into the existing doc, there are at least two
>        other RFCs that reference this paper directly.  Would there be any
>        problem w/ sending this on the informational track?

"Fred" above should read "Frank". He did a lot of work in this regard.

Yes, I would suggest you ship it off and post it.