Re: [RRG] Traffic Engineering scenarios
Olivier Bonaventure <Olivier.Bonaventure@uclouvain.be> Tue, 19 February 2008 19:39 UTC
Envelope-to: rrg-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:39:27 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=uclouvain.be; h= message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q= dns/txt; s=selucl; bh=h0ZKs6DFnMMB3K7iy5y3bhow8II=; b=OSlo7QHuki OoVNIY4Qq8IRfRpBi8LTWvwEGK1bprRoYrlLMH5b6p5kOtmu53dCYoPCusUR6wsl N2eioNI/waEFplio61EF9/BNe79EiNeveYydUb9YoaQczpK2kl8om8gyuY+fBXNK ZUhPfu1OshFClya9hdfLo1ojhovsdTcK8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=uclouvain.be; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=selucl; b= pWmZQRlU41lQ1VcYSQmFQgI1ffVCzDaHaWAZUcwYdN2X159Z/qfjXs7Fo2n7CMCp o/MmroNwzfwZPpqKf9aNILRkMKv05gF9a7SKeClKn8NxJGxtYdrYOsOGky3mkItU 6PNqL0m8zJFyQMCnfLmADzjhvUo6DpYQsJrtJr5Y3s4=
Message-ID: <47BB3056.4080704@uclouvain.be>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:39:02 +0100
From: Olivier Bonaventure <Olivier.Bonaventure@uclouvain.be>
Reply-To: Olivier.Bonaventure@uclouvain.be
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Randall Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>
CC: IRTF Routing RG <rrg@psg.com>
Subject: Re: [RRG] Traffic Engineering scenarios
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Randall, > On occasions when I have talked with IP service providers about > traffic engineering, I have heard very different inputs from each > ISP. > > It would be very helpful, I think, for the sundry ISP-aware folks > here to write up I-Ds on the various TE deployment scenarios > that they care about, what issues those TE deployments seek > to solve, and so forth. Jason Schiller did this exercice some years ago, see : http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0505/pdf/schiller.pdf We have used these case studies to develop a new service that would allow network operators to influence the paths selected by hosts in a shim6 environment, or ITR in a LISP environment. Please find below the abstract of the two drafts. The will appear on the IETF mirrors. In the meantime, they can be retrieved from http://inl.info.ucl.ac.be/publications Title : The case for an informed path selection service Author(s) : O. Bonaventure, D. Saucez, B. Donnet Filename : draft-bonaventure-informed-path-selection-00.txt With today's peer-to-peer applications, more and more content is available from multiple sources. In tomorrow's Internet hosts will have multiple paths to reach one destination host with the deployment of dual-stack IPv4/IPv6 hosts, but also with new techniques such as shim6 or other locator/identifier mechanisms being discussed within the IRTF RRG. All these hosts will need to rank paths in order to select the best paths to reach a given destination/content. In this draft, we propose an informed path selection service that would be queried by hosts and would rank paths based on policies and performance metrics defined by the network operator to meet his traffic engineering objectives. A companion document describes a protocol that implements this service. Title : IDIPS : ISP-Driven Informed Path Selection Author(s) : D. Saucez, et al. Filename : draft-saucez-idips-00.txt This draft describes a simple network-based protocol to facilitate Path Selection and to improve traffic engineering capabilities in multihomed corporate networks. With this protocol, any network device that requires to select a path among a list of different paths asks a Traffic Engineering service called IDIPS (ISP-Driven Informed Path Selection) to obtain an ordered list of the possible paths. The ordering is constructed according to policies and performance requirements of both the host and network provider. Olivier -- http://inl.info.ucl.ac.be , Universite catholique de Louvain, Belgium -- to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
- [RRG] Traffic Engineering scenarios Randall Atkinson
- Re: [RRG] Traffic Engineering scenarios Olivier Bonaventure
- RE: [RRG] Traffic Engineering scenarios Randall Atkinson
- Re: [RRG] Traffic Engineering scenarios Jason Schiller
- Re: [RRG] Traffic Engineering scenarios Pekka Savola