IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rrg] Default intra-domain routing

Toni Stoev <irtf@tonistoev.info> Fri, 08 May 2009 01:06 UTC

Return-Path: <irtf@tonistoev.info>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45D663A6A75 for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 May 2009 18:06:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.158
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.158 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.441, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KRhnKFPHJRBW for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 May 2009 18:06:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chi.r1servers.com (chi.r1servers.com [82.119.92.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3953A6EB9 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 7 May 2009 18:06:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 85-91-132-61.spectrumnet.bg ([85.91.132.61] helo=laptop.local) by chi.r1servers.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <irtf@tonistoev.info>) id 1M2EZ1-0003Km-DF for rrg@irtf.org; Fri, 08 May 2009 04:07:47 +0300
From: Toni Stoev <irtf@tonistoev.info>
To: IRTF RRG <rrg@irtf.org>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 04:07:47 +0300
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9
References: <200905080145.48786.irtf@tonistoev.info> <200905080215.24142.irtf@tonistoev.info> <200905080252.45861.irtf@tonistoev.info>
In-Reply-To: <200905080252.45861.irtf@tonistoev.info>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200905080407.47253.irtf@tonistoev.info>
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - chi.r1servers.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - irtf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tonistoev.info
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Subject: Re: [rrg] Default intra-domain routing
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 01:06:40 -0000

And how about objective and accurate native determination of routing domain based on locators?
> How about default intra-domain routing mechanism utilizing just locator longest match?
> > Do we want the default intra-domain routing mechanism to be based on locators?
> > > Do we want a single default intra-domain routing mechanism providing reachability throughout a routing domain?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email