Re: [rrg] [ILNP] What to do when Locator Updates are lost
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Wed, 18 July 2012 08:28 UTC
Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E90B21F873C for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 01:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.425
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.425 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.025, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vEHvSj+vCtzv for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 01:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [192.134.4.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17BE921F873A for <rrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 01:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 676EA2802FA; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:29:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay1.nic.fr (relay1.nic.fr [192.134.4.162]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62CD62802D6; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:29:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2219:8::6:69]) by relay1.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5680F4C007F; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:28:38 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:28:38 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Ran Atkinson <ran.atkinson@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120718082838.GA4647@nic.fr>
References: <9ACA09DB-4312-4CAB-8AC7-647903749F87@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9ACA09DB-4312-4CAB-8AC7-647903749F87@gmail.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux wheezy/sid
X-Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: IRTF Routing RG <rrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [rrg] [ILNP] What to do when Locator Updates are lost
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 08:28:53 -0000
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 04:18:23PM -0400, Ran Atkinson <ran.atkinson@gmail.com> wrote a message of 47 lines which said: > The precise frequency and interval of retransmissions for LU > messages is difficult to specify in a precise and correct manner > absent more operational experience with ILNP implementations. So > we've left that detail for a future specification revision, Makes sense. And I understand it is too late to add anything in the draft. Keep it in mind for a future revision? It is an interesting problem. > the authors have been told very explicitly that no specification > edits are allowed at this time. It does not prevent to fix the "compression" bug in draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-dns-06, I presume?
- [rrg] [ILNP] What to do when Locator Updates are … Stephane Bortzmeyer
- [rrg] [ILNP] What to do when Locator Updates are … Ran Atkinson
- Re: [rrg] [ILNP] What to do when Locator Updates … Stephane Bortzmeyer