IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rrg] Inter/intra-domain routing separation

Toni Stoev <irtf@tonistoev.info> Tue, 05 May 2009 23:34 UTC

Return-Path: <irtf@tonistoev.info>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1109F3A6B25 for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 May 2009 16:34:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.599, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o5g-nmdk3RuQ for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 May 2009 16:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chi.r1servers.com (chi.r1servers.com [82.119.92.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E7963A69FD for <rrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2009 16:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 85-91-132-61.spectrumnet.bg ([85.91.132.61] helo=laptop.local) by chi.r1servers.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <irtf@tonistoev.info>) id 1M1UAz-0004ZY-69 for rrg@irtf.org; Wed, 06 May 2009 02:35:53 +0300
From: Toni Stoev <irtf@tonistoev.info>
To: IRTF RRG <rrg@irtf.org>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 02:35:52 +0300
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9
References: <200905051235.41286.irtf@tonistoev.info>
In-Reply-To: <200905051235.41286.irtf@tonistoev.info>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200905060235.52415.irtf@tonistoev.info>
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - chi.r1servers.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - irtf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tonistoev.info
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Subject: Re: [rrg] Inter/intra-domain routing separation
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 23:34:31 -0000

How can locator have default association with its containing autonomous system?
Easy. Autonomous system number shall be incorporated into locator. Universally recognizable locator shall start with it.

On Tuesday 5 May 2009 12:35:41 Toni Stoev sent:
> Intra-domain routing can be considered as a general solution. This general solution is the provision of reachability throughout an autonomous system.
> Node locators can be considered intra-domain locators. Every locator shall have default association with its containing autonomous system in order to be universally recognizable.
> Utilizing these approaches inter-domain routing can be separated from intra-domain routing. Inter-domain routing shall be based on autonomous system paths and not on IP addresses and prefixes. Thus inter-domain routing tables will be substantially unloaded and more easily managed.
> This will provide significant improvement to inter-domain routing scalability.
> _______________________________________________
> rrg mailing list
> rrg@irtf.org
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email