IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rrg] Paul Jakma's blog article

Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au> Fri, 19 February 2010 00:09 UTC

Return-Path: <rw@firstpr.com.au>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EFB23A7A63 for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:09:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.723
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.723 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.172, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AU=0.377, HOST_EQ_AU=0.327]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iVEUaVZLrLhE for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:09:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gair.firstpr.com.au (gair.firstpr.com.au [150.101.162.123]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F5413A7979 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:09:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.6] (wira.firstpr.com.au [10.0.0.6]) by gair.firstpr.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15BB8175AA1; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:11:22 +1100 (EST)
Message-ID: <4B7DD728.2000305@firstpr.com.au>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:11:20 +1100
From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
Organization: First Principles
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: RRG <rrg@irtf.org>
References: <4B7617EB.5090800@firstpr.com.au> <alpine.LFD.2.00.1002131045540.27055@stoner.jakma.org> <4B76ABB1.6040302@firstpr.com.au> <alpine.LFD.2.00.1002131438040.27055@stoner.jakma.org> <4B777152.8030706@firstpr.com.au> <alpine.LFD.2.00.1002141146570.27055@stoner.jakma.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1002141146570.27055@stoner.jakma.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rrg] Paul Jakma's blog article
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:09:42 -0000

Hi Paul,

I hope to return to our discussions later, but at present my top
priority is to read, understand and write about all the proposals.

Please take a look at Patrick Frejborg's 05 revision of his hIPv4 proposal:

  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-frejborg-hipv4-05

and the discussions he and I had on the list in recent days.  I think he
adds 32 bits to the left, conceptually, of the IPv4 space, giving large
numbers of separate IPv4 like address ranges.  I suggested (msg06050)
something which might be more in line with what you are aiming for,
adding bits on the right:

  I would also want to explore options for giving multiple new
  addresses behind each existing IPv4 address.


    - Robin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email