IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rrg] [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning-00.txt

Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com> Wed, 04 March 2009 18:09 UTC

Return-Path: <dino@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B165B3A698D for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 10:09:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JntX3yrUECGU for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 10:09:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3.cisco.com [171.71.176.72]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 912AB3A696D for <rrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 10:09:24 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,301,1233532800"; d="scan'208";a="139377223"
Received: from sj-dkim-1.cisco.com ([171.71.179.21]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Mar 2009 18:08:53 +0000
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254]) by sj-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n24I8raf001493; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 10:08:53 -0800
Received: from xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-231.cisco.com [128.107.191.100]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n24I8qqx023381; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 18:08:53 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.174]) by xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 4 Mar 2009 10:08:52 -0800
Received: from [192.168.1.5] ([10.21.126.4]) by xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 4 Mar 2009 10:08:51 -0800
Message-Id: <60970FDB-3CBE-47C0-B613-80EAF6F371CD@cisco.com>
From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
To: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <49AEC1DC.3020001@firstpr.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:08:52 -0800
References: <20090303181503.470533A67F2@core3.amsl.com> <C50348EC-F61D-4BAE-B32E-B11D389B84CD@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de> <49AEC1DC.3020001@firstpr.com.au>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Mar 2009 18:08:51.0739 (UTC) FILETIME=[4603FEB0:01C99CF4]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=448; t=1236190133; x=1237054133; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1004; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=dino@cisco.com; z=From:=20Dino=20Farinacci=20<dino@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[lisp]=20[rrg]=20Fwd=3A=20I-D=20Action= 3Adraft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning-00.txt |Sender:=20; bh=aArjf0c3BHSl8uyj7yZDvLQbxmk0gChwqTIPztGmXfg=; b=BFylkmyBYF/pkDSKPAzjleDMUipbymTRqjfqirwnJ9MWp7vEJjtJnJDpAS 11YWNG6mf9iwPYs5WJZy8fufwDyl/GxbdehnjqC8HGppOOXUl/WAEe2qaI5j HkW3Mx5cDCWN6yWaEoMw3w3eKTYca3F3NNO7U1+0mUVPyR3Ij00LM=;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=dino@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; );
Cc: rrg@irtf.org, lisp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rrg] [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning-00.txt
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:09:24 -0000

> I understand this is a proposed change to the LISP protocol.  I guess
> it is independent of the work of the main LISP-ALT team, who have
> updated their main I-D and added a new one:
>
>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fuller-lisp-ms-00
>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farinacci-lisp-12
>
> in recent days, in ways which seem unrelated to your suggestion.

Yes the two efforts are completely independent and not related.

Dino

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email