[rrg] Fwd: AUTH48 [AH]: RFC 6115 <draft-irtf-rrg-recommendation-16.txt> NOW AVAILABLE

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Mon, 07 February 2011 22:59 UTC

Return-Path: <tony.li@tony.li>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B74AB3A6EA8 for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:59:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29OSQ7z7ZID8 for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:59:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from qmta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.27.243]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A44853A6E5B for <rrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:59:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.71]) by qmta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 5Arw1g0051Y3wxoADAzF1D; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 22:59:15 +0000
Received: from dhcp-171-70-245-69.cisco.com ([171.70.245.69]) by omta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 5Az61g0061WZoRF8bAz8vX; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 22:59:13 +0000
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 14:59:05 -0800
References: <20110207175610.03989E0726@rfc-editor.org>
To: rrg@irtf.org
Message-Id: <ADDEE649-A33E-44A6-A8D0-76B1C70D2A1B@tony.li>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Subject: [rrg] Fwd: AUTH48 [AH]: RFC 6115 <draft-irtf-rrg-recommendation-16.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 22:59:11 -0000

FYI...  Comments and issues to me immediately, please.

Tony

Begin forwarded message:

> From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> Date: February 7, 2011 9:56:10 AM PST
> To: tony.li@tony.li
> Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, irsg@isi.edu, jmh@joelhalpern.com, jari.arkko@piuha.net
> Subject: AUTH48 [AH]: RFC 6115 <draft-irtf-rrg-recommendation-16.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
> 
> 
> *****IMPORTANT*****
> 
> Updated 2011/02/07
> 
> RFC Author(s):
> --------------
> 
> Instructions for Completing AUTH48 in XML
> 
> This is your last chance to make changes to your RFC-to-be: 
> draft-irtf-rrg-recommendation-16.txt.
> Once the document is published as an RFC, we will not make changes.  
> Please follow the instructions below to complete the AUTH48 process.
> 
> 1) Review the edited document completely.  The files are available here:
> 
>   http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc6115.txt
>   http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc6115-diff.html
> 
>   We recommend reviewing the entire document, not just the diff file.
>   The placement of page breaks will be handled during the final stages of
>   publication (typically post-xml2rfc processing).
> 
> 2) Review and resolve (as necessary) any questions raised by the RFC
>   Editor.  The questions (if any) have been included in the XML file as
>   comments marked <!-- [rfced] ... --> and will be sent in a subsequent email.
> 
>   Retrieve the edited XML file here:
> 
>      http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc6115.xml
> 
>   (Note that you may need to view the page source to save the file.)
> 
> 3) Send us your changes or respond with your approval for publication.  
>   Please use 'Reply All' so that rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org and the parties
>   CC'ed on this message receive your response. Note that your document will
>   not move forward until we have received approvals from each of the
>   authors listed on the front page.
> 
>   If sending changes, please do one of the following:
> 
>   a. Update the provided XML file, then email us the revised XML file.  
>      You may use any filename for the revised file; we will rename it 
>      before posting it.
> 
>   --OR--
> 
>   b. Provide us with an explicit list of changes in the this format.
> 
>      Section # (or indicate Global)
> 
>      OLD:
>      old text
> 
>      NEW:
>      new text
> 
>   Be sure to pay particular attention to these areas of the document:
>   - IANA Considerations updates (if applicable)
>   - Contact information
>   - Copyright notice and legends (see item 5 for more details)
> 
> 4) Review changes submitted by your coauthors.  We assume that you
>   will speak up if you do not agree with the proposed changes. That is,
>   your silence is your assent to changes submitted by your coauthors.
>   Note that any changes that are beyond editorial will be sent to the
>   relevant body for approval. 
> 
>   Additional diff files will be posted as authors send updates for the
>   document.  We recommend viewing these  later diff files to identify and
>   review changes submitted by your coauthors. 
> 
> 5) Review the copyright notice and legends as defined in RFC 5378 and 
>   the Trust Legal Provisions (TLP -- http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/).
> 
>   If your document was approved for publication with a pre-RFC-5378
>   copyright notice, we have applied the text from section 6.c.iii of the
>   TLP.  Please consider whether this text is required (note that the
>   6.c.iii text is not applicable to Independent Stream RFCs).  See item
>   4.5 of the "Copyright FAQ" at http://trustee.ietf.org/faqs.html for
>   guidance on whether this text applies to your document.
> 
> 6) Please reply, as the document will not be published until we receive
>   approvals from each author.  The details of the AUTH48 status of your
>   document are here:
> 
>   http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc6115
> 
> Thank you for your cooperation,
> 
> RFC Editor
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6115 (draft-irtf-rrg-recommendation-16)
> --------------------------------------
> Title            : Recommendation for a Routing Architecture
> Author(s)        : T. Li, Ed.
> 
>