Re: [rrg] Analysis of name-based sockets (with attachment)

Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au> Sat, 16 January 2010 08:29 UTC

Return-Path: <rw@firstpr.com.au>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 387513A680A for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 00:29:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.392
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.392 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.503, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AU=0.377, HOST_EQ_AU=0.327]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z0i6uwy1jXlm for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 00:29:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gair.firstpr.com.au (gair.firstpr.com.au [150.101.162.123]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2BDB3A6767 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 00:29:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.6] (wira.firstpr.com.au [10.0.0.6]) by gair.firstpr.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5448B1759CB; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 19:29:17 +1100 (EST)
Message-ID: <4B5178DD.3060201@firstpr.com.au>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 19:29:17 +1100
From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
Organization: First Principles
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Routing Research Group Mailing List <rrg@irtf.org>
References: <1263565713.3715.31.camel@bit> <4B516AF4.7040807@tony.li> <4B5173F0.2010100@firstpr.com.au> <4B51752E.6060207@tony.li> <1263629903.3110.1.camel@bit>
In-Reply-To: <1263629903.3110.1.camel@bit>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rrg] Analysis of name-based sockets (with attachment)
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 08:29:22 -0000

Hi Tony and Javier,

Thanks for your replies.

My understanding is that one or more people can write a critique and
post it to the list.  Then other people can suggest improvements,
which the original author(s) may or may not incorporate to the
satisfaction of the second person.

Second and subsequent individuals or groups can contribute
alternative critiques by posting them to the list - and Lixia and
Tony will choose one of them.

I think this would be a good approach.  In that case, I think that
whenever anyone posts a critique to the list, that it should not be
immediately "incorporated".

  - Robin