IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rrg] p=np !

heinerhummel@aol.com Mon, 05 September 2011 20:37 UTC

Return-Path: <heinerhummel@aol.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED38621F8B32 for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.209
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.209 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.207, BAYES_40=-0.185, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_12=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QVsEcw4dYCAO for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imr-da04.mx.aol.com (imr-da04.mx.aol.com [205.188.105.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6953521F8B28 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtaomg-da01.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-da01.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.137]) by imr-da04.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p85KdOOn002611; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:39:24 -0400
Received: from core-dqb003a.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-dqb003.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.212.201]) by mtaomg-da01.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id A0DDEE00008F; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:39:23 -0400 (EDT)
References: <8CE39654461E569-F18-49E23@Webmail-d117.sysops.aol.com> <CAOqz15re_XKy3+nmgaOpPbsCnapske7FcrJZmxa5DuQDnkMT2Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: jinchoe@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAOqz15re_XKy3+nmgaOpPbsCnapske7FcrJZmxa5DuQDnkMT2Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI
Received: from 178.26.0.180 by webmail-m003.sysops.aol.com (64.12.101.86) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:39:23 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: heinerhummel@aol.com
X-MB-Message-Type: User
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CE3A2307CB8AE0_158C_40F67_webmail-m003.sysops.aol.com"
X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 34078-STANDARD
Message-Id: <8CE3A2307BD429A-158C-1AC4B@webmail-m003.sysops.aol.com>
X-Originating-IP: [178.26.0.180]
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:39:23 -0400
x-aol-global-disposition: G
X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:347361408:93952408
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d33894e65337b0d18
Cc: rrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [rrg] p=np !
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 20:37:50 -0000

Sorry, I can't. 
It is only myself who thinks to have developed a solution for a np-hard problem. Precisely for the Steiner Tree problem.
A solution by which any possible lever is applied to improve a current Steiner Tree until no further lever can quench out any more weight reduction of the tree at all.


I am not a man the press is interested in. Hence I cannot refer to any press news.


Heiner





-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- 
Von: JinHyeock Choi <jinchoe@gmail.com>
An: heinerhummel <heinerhummel@aol.com>
Cc: rrg <rrg@irtf.org>
Verschickt: So, 4 Sept 2011 8:17 pm
Betreff: Re: [rrg] p=np !


> I like to assure all on this mailing list that P = NP.

You mean
it has been proved that P = NP?

if so, would you provide a pointer to a relevant article?

That could bring forth a huge impact.

best regards

JinHyeock

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email