Re: [rrg] Revised ILNP I-Ds posted
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Mon, 02 April 2012 08:18 UTC
Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BA5921F8868 for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 01:18:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NgdcRV5RcwmR for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 01:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx5.nic.fr (mx5.nic.fr [192.134.4.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A87221F8866 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 01:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx5.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx5.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id CFD35300654; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:17:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mx5.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1137) id 8F70A30065D; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:17:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay1.nic.fr (relay1.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:9::4:162]) by mx5.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A80300654; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:17:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2219:8::6:69]) by relay1.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D9744C0006; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:17:44 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 10:17:44 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Message-ID: <20120402081744.GA28875@nic.fr>
References: <05D4E35B-44E3-47AE-893E-CD4D27C3547B@gmail.com> <B3028EE9-39C9-428C-9B0A-8C978AC08F82@tony.li>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <B3028EE9-39C9-428C-9B0A-8C978AC08F82@tony.li>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux wheezy/sid
X-Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000023, version=1.2.2
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2012.4.2.80023
X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report=' MULTIPLE_RCPTS 0.1, HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_600_699 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CD 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __MULTIPLE_RCPTS_CC_X2 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __URI_NO_PATH 0, __URI_NO_WWW 0, __URI_NS , __USER_AGENT 0'
Cc: IRTF Routing RG <rrg@irtf.org>, RJ Atkinson <rja.lists@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [rrg] Revised ILNP I-Ds posted
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 08:18:10 -0000
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 08:51:31AM -0700, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> wrote a message of 57 lines which said: > Could the folks who have outstanding comments on these drafts please > either provide further comments or approval? > > By my records that would be: I'm not in the list :-) but, anyway, here is my opinion: * my comment about header format has been addressed and solved, * my comment about caches and ILCC has been addressed. I would not say "solved" since the issue is complicated. I think that the document can be published as-is and the question about ILCC use and implementation revised later, with practical experience.
- [rrg] Revised ILNP I-Ds posted RJ Atkinson
- Re: [rrg] Revised ILNP I-Ds posted Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Revised ILNP I-Ds posted Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [rrg] Revised ILNP I-Ds posted George, Wes
- Re: [rrg] Revised ILNP I-Ds posted Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [rrg] Revised ILNP I-Ds posted Steven Blake
- Re: [rrg] Revised ILNP I-Ds posted George, Wes
- Re: [rrg] Revised ILNP I-Ds posted Tony Li