[RRG] Question about Six/One host and router

"Flinck, Hannu (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannu.flinck@nsn.com> Mon, 21 July 2008 11:45 UTC

Envelope-to: rrg-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:46:05 +0000
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [RRG] Question about Six/One host and router
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:45:22 +0300
Message-ID: <2B5F3EA7272CFF47A66518E4FF3BE23565FC62@FIESEXC014.nsn-intra.net>
Thread-Topic: Question about Six/One host and router
Thread-Index: AcjrJ0IOPXAdewMsRRCHm+kp18IerQ==
From: "Flinck, Hannu (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannu.flinck@nsn.com>
To: Routing Research Group <rrg@psg.com>

Hello Christian!

Thank you for good write-ups and updates to Six/One proposal. I was
wondering how do you see the host based approach of
draft-vogt-rrg-six-one-01.txt fitting with the unilateral mode in
http://users.piuha.net/chvogt/pub/2008/vogt-2008-six-one-router-design.p
df? In the later document you do not seem to discuss the host based
approach. However, it looks to me that if a host is performing the
address rewrites of Six/one in  the local network then the remote
network believes that it should be in the unilateral mode unless the
bilateral/unilateral bit/header is not conveyed by the Six/one host. I
also notice that the six-one-01.txt draft is expired which could explain
why the six/one capable host functionality is not mentioned in the other
document.


Best regards
Hannu   

  

--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg