Re: [rrg] Locator: routing scalability
HeinerHummel@aol.com Thu, 14 May 2009 19:09 UTC
Return-Path: <HeinerHummel@aol.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4765E3A695B for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 May 2009 12:09:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.100, BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jAtDd09m3rBn for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 May 2009 12:09:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imr-m08.mx.aol.com (imr-m08.mx.aol.com [64.12.138.210]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA093A6C35 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 14 May 2009 12:09:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imo-da04.mx.aol.com (imo-da04.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.202]) by imr-m08.mx.aol.com (v107.10) with ESMTP id RELAYIN2-34a0c6ca321d; Thu, 14 May 2009 15:10:27 -0400
Received: from HeinerHummel@aol.com by imo-da04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v40_r1.5.) id a.cc9.5094be77 (39331); Thu, 14 May 2009 15:10:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
Message-ID: <cc9.5094be77.373dc69a@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 15:10:18 -0400
To: irtf@tonistoev.info, rrg@irtf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1242328218"
X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5021
X-AOL-IP: 205.188.169.202
Subject: Re: [rrg] Locator: routing scalability
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 19:09:08 -0000
In einer eMail vom 14.05.2009 10:31:34 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt irtf@tonistoev.info: So locator may name node. And node may be host/router. Being confident routing researchers, let us go on for the routing scalability. Please answer the following question: Does locator have to facilitate routing with its structure? My answer is: yes, it must. Toni I have the same answer. Yes it must. With strategy C such that by 90 % a single table-offset (i.e. as by the locator) retrieves the next hop. Note: GPS is state of the art. We don't live in the 1980s anymore. Heiner
- Re: [rrg] Locator: routing scalability HeinerHummel
- Re: [rrg] Locator: routing scalability Toni Stoev
- Re: [rrg] Locator: routing scalability HeinerHummel
- Re: [rrg] Locator: routing scalability Toni Stoev
- [rrg] RANGER(S) Templin, Fred L